<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
        <description> Slic3r 0.9.5 is out :D

Be sure to grab it!  A big thanks to Sound for the new version.




I am looking to rally support for a raft feature to be added to Slic3r.

If you would like to see a raft feature added to Slic3r, please make a post on this feature request on Slic3r&#039;s GitHub page.





To me, 3D printing with a hobby-printer is akin to an art form (like clay sculpting).

In fact, silly as it sounds, I find very little of the process to be &quot;automatic.&quot;

It is more like a manual process that takes a lot of time to see the results of your actions! ;)

Just like any artist I would like access to the tools of that trade.

Not every painting uses the largest or smallest brushes; Not every sculpture uses the same set of chisels.

A raft is simply a tool a hobby-printer enthusiast might employ in his project.

Raft use is common in &quot;professional grade printers,&quot; and should be pretty easy to add as an option.

I assume a raft has not been added yet, because there are more important things to work on; but this request is over 11 months old now, and I believe the feature is an elementary requirement.

Never implementing a raft in the program would seem like obtuse thinking to me.</description>
        <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166671#msg-166671</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 15:44:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166799#msg-166799</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166799#msg-166799</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Don't let Sound hear you say that......<br />
<br />
wasted about 2 lbs of ABS with slic3r relaeses, now a Skeinforge fanboy.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Dirty Steve</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:51:37 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166734#msg-166734</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166734#msg-166734</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ @crispy see my "sick of slic3r" rant lol]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Idolcrasher</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166733#msg-166733</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166733#msg-166733</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ crispy1 Wrote:<br />
-------------------------------------------------------<br />
&gt; Raft?  No.  What Slic3r needs in order to be taken<br />
&gt; seriously is a bug-free release.<br />
&gt; <br />
<br />
Hahahaha +1]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Idolcrasher</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:23:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166728#msg-166728</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166728#msg-166728</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Raft?  No.  What Slic3r needs in order to be taken seriously is a bug-free release.<br />
<br />
Retract between multiple copies is still broken in 0.9.5.  Surface finish is still broken in 0.9.5, and has been broken in everything past 0.7.2b.  Randomize starting points still doesn't work.  I could go on.  Most of these are longstanding bugs that have spanned multiple releases without noticeable improvement.<br />
<br />
I've used other slicing engines such as SFact, Cura, and KISSlicer.  Slic3r is hands down the most intuitive and easiest to use of them all.  It has the potential to be a really great piece of software, IF these bugs get fixed.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>crispy1</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:36:22 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166710#msg-166710</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166710#msg-166710</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ IanJohnson Wrote:<br />
-------------------------------------------------------<br />
&gt; Slic3r often generates infill that has no hope of<br />
&gt; sticking to the bed without a raft.   I hate<br />
&gt; peeling rafts off of prints, but I would<br />
&gt; appreciate a raft for support option that<br />
&gt; surrounds the print without going under it.<br />
<br />
It sounds like you mean the Brim feature :)<br />
<br />
I think Sound's priorities are correct, in implementing features that will affect the most users / those that are quickest and easiest to code. I personally don't see a need for rafts, but understand others may. Rallying together may help persuade him it is important. <br />
However, implementing a feature just because it is often viewed as a basic feature is the wrong way to approach it. For PLA and ABS it is essentially redundant, as we experiment more with different materials perhaps it will become more necessary.<br />
<br />
Issues with bed adhesion should firstly be addressed by the operator as I don't believe many people have experienced problems with how Slic3r lays the first layer, but perhaps I am wrong.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>yydoctt</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:46:58 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166707#msg-166707</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166707#msg-166707</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Slic3r often generates infill that has no hope of sticking to the bed without a raft.   I hate peeling rafts off of prints, but I would appreciate a raft for support option that surrounds the print without going under it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>IanJohnson</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:50 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166687#msg-166687</guid>
            <title>Re: Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166687#msg-166687</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ retract within island/wipe would be nice too.....]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Dirty Steve</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:55:14 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166671#msg-166671</guid>
            <title>Does Slic3r Need a Raft Feature To Be Taken Seriously?... 8-) I Think So</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,166671,166671#msg-166671</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://slic3r.org/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">Slic3r 0.9.5 is out :D</a><br />
<br />
Be sure to grab it!  A big thanks to Sound for the new version.<br />
<br />
<br />
<hr class="bbcode" />
<br />
I am looking to rally support for a raft feature to be added to Slic3r.<br />
<br />
If you would like to see a raft feature added to Slic3r, <a href="https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/123" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">please make a post on this feature request on Slic3r's GitHub page.</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<hr class="bbcode" />
<br />
<br />
To me, 3D printing with a hobby-printer is akin to an art form (like clay sculpting).<br />
<br />
In fact, silly as it sounds, I find very little of the process to be "automatic."<br />
<br />
It is more like a manual process that takes a lot of time to see the results of your actions! ;)<br />
<br />
Just like any artist I would like access to the tools of that trade.<br />
<br />
Not every painting uses the largest or smallest brushes; Not every sculpture uses the same set of chisels.<br />
<br />
A raft is simply a tool a hobby-printer enthusiast might employ in his project.<br />
<br />
Raft use is common in "professional grade printers," and should be pretty easy to add as an option.<br />
<br />
I assume a raft has not been added yet, because there are more important things to work on; but this request is over 11 months old now, and I believe the feature is an elementary requirement.<br />
<br />
Never implementing a raft in the program would seem like obtuse thinking to me.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Idolcrasher</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:43:14 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
