Nozzle internal geometry Is there any data available on the optimum internal geometry for a nozzle? I am particularly interested in getting a small nozzle size at the moment, although any other effects of geometry would also be interesting. Further info. I have found that my own nozzles are erratic, sometimes giving really good results, sometimes unacceptably bad, so I am trying to tease out the problems with my basic design. So far I have found a likely improvement by using graphite loaded PEEK to line the upper part of the nozzle and to define an inverted taper entry to the melt chamber. (discussion in [forums.reprap.org] ) This looks good but I get unexpected results - two identical nozzles with very different percieved filament feed pressure, or 0.45 and 0.35mm nozzles having similar back pressure. One suspect is in the internal geometry of the entry to the orifice. As my nozzles are drilled in a solid 50mm long 6mm dia stainless steel bar there is a degree of unrepeatability at the output end. mod_embed_images_loadimage('1bfb03ad946c3d39c90dd1f1bc904605', '/forum/thumbcache/85e/77b/0d7/356/866/765/ab3/ba0/4eb/9c3/c4_800x400.png', 'http://forums.reprap.org/file.php?1,file=20645,filename=Drilling2.jpg', 'https://reprap.org/forum/addon.php?1,module=embed_images,check_scaling=1,url=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.reprap.org%2Ffile.php%3F1%2Cfile%3D20645%2Cfilename%3DDrilling2.jpg', '', 261497, 800, 400, 'Loading image ...', false); If you look at picture you will see that, if the bottom of the drill wanders off (which it typically does to the tune of about 0.5mm) then drilling either from the outside or the inside will create a lip around the entry to the orifice. Drawing of a drill bit shows the chizel end which gives rise to a flat at the tip of the larger hole. Drawing at the right to show what I expect to be be optimum. The need for data is because it is proving difficult to drill the final small hole from the inside - 3 0.35mm drill bits silver soldered to 2mm drill stock and 3 failures - a lot of work. Drilling from the outside is easy and doesn't break drills. Mike https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261497#msg-261497 Wed, 13 May 2026 03:57:15 -0400 Phorum 5.2.23 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263256#msg-263256 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263256#msg-263256
...R]]> Robin2 General Tue, 05 Nov 2013 04:32:38 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263246#msg-263246 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263246#msg-263246
Mike]]> leadinglights General Tue, 05 Nov 2013 03:50:36 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263066#msg-263066 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263066#msg-263066
...R]]> Robin2 General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:19:19 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263010#msg-263010 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263010#msg-263010
Far be it from me to keep back mankind. I sympathise with the PhD professor as I am perplexed by Information theorists and thermodynamasists both using the word Entropy for different things; annoyed by surveillance operatives stealing and miss-using the word Metadata and maddened by the perversion of the old computer-geek word Hacker by journalists. So I humbly suggest the following terminology for the bits of a hot end:

Die and Die face are good and have analogies with other dice such as used to put a thread on a rod or make a coin by applying force.
Barrel is un-necessary as it is not separate from the melt chamber in (as far as I know) in any existing hot end.
Land is both ambiguous and unintuitive for the earlier mentioned initiate.
Throat is excellent.
Extrudate serves to distinguish the output filament from the input filament.

Mike]]> leadinglights General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:31:28 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263000#msg-263000 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,263000#msg-263000
"Having said that, there is something refreshing about using words most likely to be understood by the initiate - even if this is quite often ambiguous."

In some fields, or at a low level, I guess that would be OK.

But in the case of statistics, it's very upsetting, even maddening.
In my studies I found a PhD professor complaining about this in a paper.
He provided an example of one word with numerous renditions.
This word had about 20 different other words that meant the same thing taken from various disciplines.

Not being consistent with terms makes it massively difficult to research a topic when the words are not consistent, discoveries are lost, man kind is held back.
People naming functions after them selves, or based on the topic in which the innovation was discovered is typically how some things are named.
Statisticians really need to create a standard or cross reference between disciplines.]]> A2 General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:25:33 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262993#msg-262993 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262993#msg-262993
Agree, an example based on your definition: on a screw, the flat of the flight is called the "flight lands",
and it has a close relationship with the I.D. of the barrel.

Land (Gate Area): Gate dimension parallel to the direction of melt flow.

Land. A term used to describe the area in which the gate, or vent, resides.

Land Area: The area of surfaces of a mold which contact each other when the mold is closed.

Shutoff land. A raised area of the mold surface surrounding the cavity image.
This area is usually between 0.002 and 0.003 inch high, approximately 1/2 inch wide and is used to focus clamping pressure on the mold.
The use of a shutoff land reduces the amount of tonnage required to keep a mold closed against injection pressure.]]> A2 General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:05:41 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262991#msg-262991 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262991#msg-262991
Having said that, there is something refreshing about using words most likely to be understood by the initiate - even if this is quite often ambiguous.

Mike]]> leadinglights General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:00:42 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262980#msg-262980 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262980#msg-262980 Die.

Die face = planar end surface = end wall = The surface adjacent the orifice.

Die angle = An internal taper which is located ahead of the land (e.g. the 118 degree drill angle).

Barrel = The region before the die angle.

If the external profile of the die (hot end) is tapered, then the geometry of "die face" is called a frustum.

Orifice entry dia = Throat (i.e. the radius feature connecting the land to the "die angle", this is the start of the compression zone).

The material exiting the orifice is called the "extrudate".

Melt swell = Swelling of the extrudate occurs at the die face (i.e. die exit), (i.e. relaxation of the internal stresses generated in the throat, and land regions).

Draw down = When you pull on the extrudate, and it's diameter is reduced (e.g. the rate of travel stretches the extrudate).]]> A2 General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:22:05 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262967#msg-262967 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262967#msg-262967
So still, what to call the feature that I previously knew as Land?

Face may work, but I particularly like the word Podex.
[attachment 20807 Drilling4.JPG]]]> leadinglights General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:22:21 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262949#msg-262949 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262949#msg-262949 nophead General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 06:20:58 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262911#msg-262911 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262911#msg-262911


So what should it be called?

Mike
]]> leadinglights General Mon, 04 Nov 2013 04:43:56 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262234#msg-262234 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262234#msg-262234
While it was only by accident, I think my inference from the patent application is consistent with your definitions.

Maybe this is one of those cases where I heard the word used in the past and assumed it meant something different from what the author intended - but I can't remember any examples now.

...R]]> Robin2 General Sat, 02 Nov 2013 06:14:12 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262135#msg-262135 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262135#msg-262135
(3) The surface of an extrusion die parallel to the direction of melt flow.
[www.brenntagspecialties.com]

Land. A term used to describe the area in which the gate, or vent, resides. It can also be thought of as the ``length'' dimension in the ``l, w, h'' terminology used for describing the dimensions of the gate or vent.
[www.plastictroubleshooter.com]

Land (Gate Area): Gate dimension parallel to the direction of melt flow.
[www.apisolution.com]]]> A2 General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:21:01 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262084#msg-262084 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262084#msg-262084
Mike]]> leadinglights General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:43:28 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262041#msg-262041 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,262041#msg-262041
Also, I presume the moving optical fibre draws the "goo" through the nozzle - which might explain why a longer "land" is a bad thing.

None of this seems relevant to RepRap.

However the outer extrusion nozzle shows no depth at all. I wonder is there is lesson in that for RepRap nozzles. On the other hand, I doubt if the coated optical fibre is as thin as what RepRap people try to achieve.

...R]]> Robin2 General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:53:25 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261882#msg-261882 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261882#msg-261882 as @LoboCNC mentioned I'm ending up using a length around x1.8 ~ x2.0 of nozzle hole diameter with excellent results. I'm using a SS nozzle with a 0.4mm hole (you can see in jfa3d.com.ar ).

Regards,
Javier
jfa3D.com.ar]]> jameghino General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:43:26 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261874#msg-261874 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261874#msg-261874
A project that I put on hold when I started building 3D printers is an EDM machine. For the moment though, I will keep to my old lathe.

I think I have come up with a way to do the holes:
1) Drill the inner holes, allowing the deep holes to go where they will. Include the inner profile but not the orifice.
2) Make up a plug in the lathe which accurately fits the inside of the workpiece at both ends (waisted between the ends)
3) Fit the workpiece over the plug and clamp in place somehow
4) Use a center drill to drill the end, but not through. If all has gone well this should be in line with the inner holes
5) Support the center drilled hole in a live center and turn the outside of the nozzle
6) Put in CNC mill and drill orifice hole from the outside - crossing fingers that nothing has gone wrong.

It will be a few days before I can get back to this though as I have run out of 303 stainless steel - and in any case will need larger diameter now to allow for external turning.

Mike

Edit: I just rereread the patent in conjunction with the drawing and I got a bit of a headache
The sentance
Quote
said orifice having a land of from to 20 mils,
followed by
Quote
diameter. Preferabl Y is between and 28%.
I stopped reading before I got to the claims as I didnt want my brains to melt

I do take your point though, there is no straight parallell portion to the orifice in that patent and that is an option that I hadn't considered.]]> leadinglights General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:18:30 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261842#msg-261842 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261842#msg-261842
"Now all I have to do is get my technique right for drilling the orifice from inside the nozzle. Having broken all 4 of my 0.35mm drill bits I am having to try to sharpen the best of them. "

Make a doorbell EDM machine to burn small holes into the nozzle.
You could even burn the ID profile! Use a dielectric fluid, and a plastic guide for the electrode.
Use a sewing needle as the electrode.
[www.youtube.com]

Jeri Ellsworth is also on KickStarter selling AR goggles! B)-
[www.kickstarter.com]]]> A2 General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:49:46 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261827#msg-261827 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261827#msg-261827 A2 General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:18:05 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261826#msg-261826 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261826#msg-261826 Read the patent snippet that I posted, and look at the patent drawing, they use the term "land".
I'm accustomed to using the term land for a feature that is located between two different geometries.
Orifice length sounds like the same thing.

@ thejollygrimreaper has pointed out a very important nozzle feature, that of being flat, and no burrs.

The face of the orifice must be flat and perpendicular to the orifice axis, and free of internal burrs.
If the surface is rounded, or at an angle the extrudate will exit either randomly, spiral, or skew to one side.
This will cause the surface of the object to undulate, which will throw off dimensions and tolerances, and produce a poor finish.]]> A2 General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:15:01 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261818#msg-261818 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261818#msg-261818 Looking again at the text of the patent, I think I have to agree with Robin2 that "Land" is the flat area at the exit of the orifice.

I have put together a drawing to show my present thoughts on terminology.

[attachment 20677 Drilling3.jpg]

My present view of my own results to date and my best judgement of what I am being told is
  1. The Orifice Entry diameter should be at least 3 times the Orifice diameter.
  2. The angle of the entry to the Orifice should be small and ideally smoothly curved.
  3. The angle of the Melt Chamber Exit does not significantly effect back pressure, but if too blunt will retain material between filament changes.
  4. The length of the Orifice should be between one and three times the Orifice diameter.
  5. The diameter of the Land should be less than or equal to two times the Orifice diameter.

Now all I have to do is get my technique right for drilling the orifice from inside the nozzle. Having broken all 4 of my 0.35mm drill bits I am having to try to sharpen the best of them.

Mike]]> leadinglights General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:04:56 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261777#msg-261777 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261777#msg-261777

...R]]> Robin2 General Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:57:15 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261754#msg-261754 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261754#msg-261754 LoboCNC General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:14:38 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261732#msg-261732 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261732#msg-261732 -------------------------------------------------------
> @ leadinglights
> "My best guess is the word "land" applies to how
> long the orifice hole is."
> Correct.
>
> The longer the land, the greater the pressure
> required to extrude.
> The shorter the land, the less pressure required
> to extrude.

the term used most often is "orifice length",

in practice in a hotend nozzle:

the shorter the orifice the less force required to push the filament through however things like oozing become more and more of a problem,
the longer you go the more force you need behind the filament, however oozing is less of a problem,

most hotends use a 0.5mm orifice length as it seems to be the happy medium between performance and machinability,

the actual tip of the nozzle also makes a huge difference typically you want a flat areas around the orifice an easy way to remove the burrs that you'll get with the small hole is the chamfer it from the outside eg : [www.flickr.com]

for the inside geometry [reprap.org] is what i use for mine internally, although more recently i've been making the 3.5mm part 4mm so the ptfeliner can go further down and reduce the meltzone a bit more than before


to get the kind of internal geometry you want the easiest way would be to machine the shape in stainless steel on a lathe and grind it in half vertically then simply use it like you would a drillbit down a small pilot hole,]]> thejollygrimreaper General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:54:54 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261681#msg-261681 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261681#msg-261681 "My best guess is the word "land" applies to how long the orifice hole is."
Correct.

The longer the land, the greater the pressure required to extrude.
The shorter the land, the less pressure required to extrude.

A zero land length in theory provides higher performance, as it would be more responsive to the on and off pressures.

I suspect that printing surface irregularities might be reduced,
and a more uniform lay of the filament is achieved with a zero land length?

Maybe home 3D printers are too crude to notice the difference?]]> A2 General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:38:46 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261672#msg-261672 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261672#msg-261672 I decided to give your suggestion of the 2nd drill bit shaped for the lead up to the small hole. I was able to modify a drill - including cutting the web between the flutes to almost nothing. It doesn't drill very well, but it only has to finish off the hole and looks O.K. when used on a bit of mild steel.

@A2
My best guess is the word "land" applies to how long the orifice hole is. There was some discussion a year or so ago (nophead?) about the effect of the length of this but there seem as many saying that it should be long as short. I have recently seen 2.5 times the hole diameter mentioned. From my own observations, I think that it is only one of several moderately important factors - I am leaning towards shorter being better.

From years of practical, rather than theroretical experiance, I would expect that features in the flow of the same order of size as the hole size would have quite an effect. So the step shown in the first diagram would have a considerable effect, while things like the angle of lead in two hole diameters away would be trivial.

My biggest problem now is how to drill a 0.35mm (or 0.45 mm) hole from the inside without the drills breaking.

Mike]]> leadinglights General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:50:26 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261642#msg-261642 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261642#msg-261642
Can you give it a single blast to create a .35 mm hole?

Quote
The laser burns away a portion of material when it cuts through. This is known as the laser kerf and ranges from 0.08mm – 0.45mm depending on the material type and other conditional factors
]]> ShadowRam General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:59:29 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261609#msg-261609 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261609#msg-261609
Use a silicon carbide grinding bit with a spire shaped tip.
You will need to find one with an extra long shaft.

Or hammer into small pieces a grinding wheel, toss it into the hole, add oil, and use a brass dowel to grind the ridge/step down.
The shape of the brass rod end dictates the form that you will be grinding into the barrel.

Starting point: The length of the orifice land is equal to the hole diameter.
Example: Dia 0.5 mm = 0.5 mm land length.
It's fairly short for the home shop to make the land accurately.
Just a guess, but I doubt any hot end sold comes close.

I was reading about this the other day for extrusion dies, and here is a patent mentioning the same thing.

" land defining orifice 2 may be present between the die face and the converging surface in order to minimize orifice wear. As this land is increased, so does back pressure. Consequently, as small a land as possible should be used in carrying out the process of this invention. Exemplary of the amount of land that can be used is land up to 20 mils wide (distance between die face at orifice and converging surface at orifice) which gives an orifice of corresponding length. "
[www.google.com]

I'm going to guess that most don't have a means of controlling or measuring the land length.
I would grind it by eye until it looked really thin :)
... and don't drop it.

A2]]> A2 General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:34:11 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261583#msg-261583 Re: Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261583#msg-261583
Would it be practical to make a screw-on tip that was shallow enough to be able to control the drilling more carefully. Would a softer material such as brass or mild steel be practical?

I assume the attraction of stainless steel is its lower heat conductivity.

...R]]> Robin2 General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:48:49 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261497#msg-261497 Nozzle internal geometry https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,261497,261497#msg-261497
Further info. I have found that my own nozzles are erratic, sometimes giving really good results, sometimes unacceptably bad, so I am trying to tease out the problems with my basic design. So far I have found a likely improvement by using graphite loaded PEEK to line the upper part of the nozzle and to define an inverted taper entry to the melt chamber. (discussion in [forums.reprap.org] ) This looks good but I get unexpected results - two identical nozzles with very different percieved filament feed pressure, or 0.45 and 0.35mm nozzles having similar back pressure. One suspect is in the internal geometry of the entry to the orifice. As my nozzles are drilled in a solid 50mm long 6mm dia stainless steel bar there is a degree of unrepeatability at the output end.



If you look at picture you will see that, if the bottom of the drill wanders off (which it typically does to the tune of about 0.5mm) then drilling either from the outside or the inside will create a lip around the entry to the orifice. Drawing of a drill bit shows the chizel end which gives rise to a flat at the tip of the larger hole. Drawing at the right to show what I expect to be be optimum.

The need for data is because it is proving difficult to drill the final small hole from the inside - 3 0.35mm drill bits silver soldered to 2mm drill stock and 3 failures - a lot of work. Drilling from the outside is easy and doesn't break drills.

Mike
]]> leadinglights General Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:34:28 -0400