<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>What type of machine would this be</title>
        <description> So what if you build a cube frame, like the corexy uses. For z you have a bed that goes up and down.  For x you have a single belt and carriage like a prusa  i3.  For y the x carriage moves back and front with a single belt like an i3.  What type of machine is this?  Where are some existing designs?

Thanks 
B</description>
        <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742108#msg-742108</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:02:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742672#msg-742672</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742672#msg-742672</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong>o_lampe</strong><br />
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong></strong><br />... unlike Delta and Polar configurations that each require completely different G-code.</div></blockquote>
<br />
They run on the same gcode, but require a different firmware. I'm sure that's what you wanted to say? :)</div></blockquote>
<br />
Yea thanks :D]]></description>
            <dc:creator>prot0typ1cal</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:41:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742663#msg-742663</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742663#msg-742663</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br /></small><strong></strong><br />... unlike Delta and Polar configurations that each require completely different G-code.</div></blockquote>
<br />
They run on the same gcode, but require a different firmware. I'm sure that's what you wanted to say? :)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>o_lampe</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:54:14 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742526#msg-742526</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742526#msg-742526</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ You still have a motor on the gantry for the X drive belt. Bowden removes the extruder motor from the X-carriage, opposed to the direct drive method.<br />
I was tempted to get the Folgertech FT-5, because they use 2x motors to drive the Y to compensate the extra Y-gantry mass. Solid design, XY linear guides. easy to build. <br />
The only thing I didn't like about the FT-5 is the melamine, though there's all aluminum upgrades available from 713Maker.com<br />
<br />
And yea, it's just known as a Cartesian. Which covers any printer that uses a XYZ coordinate system to position the extruder, unlike Delta and Polar configurations that each require completely different G-code.<br />
There's special cases for box-like bots, like the CoreXY, H-Bot and Cross-Beam (Ultimaker and Xdrive 3d printers) that isolate the drive motors from the moving mass.<br />
<br />
IMO, speed and quality have nothing to do with the configuration of the bot. Any bot with solid design, balancing mass, force and stability, will excel in speed, quality and reliability.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>prot0typ1cal</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:11:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742180#msg-742180</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742180#msg-742180</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ You could implement a Bowden feed to eliminate the x motor in the gantry or use a Titan like extruder with a pancake geared stepper motor.  I am thinking to build one of these with the Titan extruder.  I feel the corexy elaborate belts are tricky and problematic.<br />
<br />
Anyone have designs for these?  The reprap machine wiki does not seem to mention them.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>n9jcv</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:40:48 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742157#msg-742157</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742157#msg-742157</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I can't see how the folgertech is arranged, but you wouldn't normally use a single belt for Y because of the asymmetry. A belt at each end, either with a motor each or preferably a single motor connected via a long drive shaft would be more conventional. Not sure who used that first. Compared to coreXY there is more moving mass because of the X motor on the gantry (but shorter belts and a simpler coordinate system).<br />
<br />
I think conventional wisdom would lean towards coreXY being better by most measures.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742137#msg-742137</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742137#msg-742137</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yes like that but i am sure FT did not invent.  What style machine is that.  And how in speed and quality would that compare to a corexy assuming same builder and design and construction?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>n9jcv</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:21:42 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742112#msg-742112</guid>
            <title>Re: What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742112#msg-742112</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ if i'm reading your description right sounds like your describing a folger tech ft5 [<a href="https://folgertech.com/products/folger-tech-ft-5-large-scale-3d-printer-kit" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">folgertech.com</a>].  i believe its still classified as a cartesian machine.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>tolar250</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:17:40 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742108#msg-742108</guid>
            <title>What type of machine would this be</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?1,742108,742108#msg-742108</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ So what if you build a cube frame, like the corexy uses. For z you have a bed that goes up and down.  For x you have a single belt and carriage like a prusa  i3.  For y the x carriage moves back and front with a single belt like an i3.  What type of machine is this?  Where are some existing designs?<br />
<br />
Thanks <br />
B]]></description>
            <dc:creator>n9jcv</dc:creator>
            <category>General</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:09:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
