<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Questions on photogrammetry using cross-polarization:-</title>
        <description>  Is an extinction ratio of 0.9 to 0.95 good enough for cross-polarization photogrammetry? (this number is an educated guess) Do circular polarizing photographic filters have a worse extinction ratio than linear polarizing filters?

Further information:-
Early 3D scanner rigs that I have built have been somewhat disappointing so I am in the process of building another rig. This one consists of a turntable from a Ciclop scanner, a Raspberry Pi high-quality (10MPx) camera with a 16mm lens, and a polarizing filter. Two MR11 spotlights with polarizing filters are used for illumination: these are 37mm circular polarizing filters with the 1/4 wave layer towards the light source.

The problem I have is that looking directly through both filters and adjusting for maximum extinction is a bit like looking through dark glasses - not at all like the near total extinction I expected. Looking at the view from the camera and adjusting both spotlight polarizers and camera polarization reduces the specular highlights but not to the point of extinction.

Edit: Attached photo showing highlights reduced but not extinguished, also a picture of the camera with polarized spotlights
[attachment 119532 CrossPol15.jpg][attachment 119533 Camera_with_lights.jpg]

Any advice appreciated.

Mike</description>
        <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?138,889665,889665#msg-889665</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:18:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?138,889665,889665#msg-889665</guid>
            <title>Questions on photogrammetry using cross-polarization:-</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?138,889665,889665#msg-889665</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <ul><li> Is an extinction ratio of 0.9 to 0.95 good enough for cross-polarization photogrammetry? (this number is an educated guess)</li><li> Do circular polarizing photographic filters have a worse extinction ratio than linear polarizing filters?</li></ul>
<br />
Further information:-<br />
Early 3D scanner rigs that I have built have been somewhat disappointing so I am in the process of building another rig. This one consists of a turntable from a Ciclop scanner, a Raspberry Pi high-quality (10MPx) camera with a 16mm lens, and a polarizing filter. Two MR11 spotlights with polarizing filters are used for illumination: these are 37mm circular polarizing filters with the 1/4 wave layer towards the light source.<br />
<br />
The problem I have is that looking directly through both filters and adjusting for maximum extinction is a bit like looking through dark glasses - not at all like the near total extinction I expected. Looking at the view from the camera and adjusting both spotlight polarizers and camera polarization reduces the specular highlights but not to the point of extinction.<br />
<br />
<b>Edit:</b> Attached photo showing highlights reduced but not extinguished, also a picture of the camera with polarized spotlights<br />
[attachment 119532 CrossPol15.jpg][attachment 119533 Camera_with_lights.jpg]<br />
<br />
Any advice appreciated.<br />
<br />
Mike]]></description>
            <dc:creator>leadinglights</dc:creator>
            <category>3D Scanners, Book Scanners, and Optics</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 06:05:10 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
