<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>X and Y step values</title>
        <description> Hi guys,

I started with a Sunhokey acrylic framed i3 clone and it had X and Y step values of 80.5 to get the required scale in the printouts.

I have just completed a rework using Emotiontech&#039;s prusa i3 rework V1.5 and now to be able to get correct scale in my printouts, I needed to reduce my X and y step values to around 75.

I&#039;m interested to know why I needed to do this.

My pulleys, stepper motors and belt pitch has not chnaged (although I did replace the belts) so the mathematical equation to arrive at the step values still holds true, but I am required to have lesser values otherwise my prints come out bigger than they should be.

I have my scale correct now but am interested in why my end step values don&#039;t reflect the calculation based on the hardware used.

Should I worry about it?

Cheers,

Steve</description>
        <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706128#msg-706128</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 23:36:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706318#msg-706318</guid>
            <title>Re: X and Y step values</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706318#msg-706318</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I looked at the Emotiontech's prusa i3 rework V1.5 specs on Thingiverse and the one aspect that would seem to make the difference is the different size bearing(s) in the Y-idler assembly maybe???. Different diameter may throw stepping off??  I assume the x-axis bearings are also a different size than the original too??<br />
<br />
After thinking it through, the smaller idler bearing should not effect the step value. Are you using different pulleys (teeth count the same)?<br />
<br />
A bit of a stumper...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>psneddon</dc:creator>
            <category>Prusa i3 and variants</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 12:36:48 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706232#msg-706232</guid>
            <title>Re: X and Y step values</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706232#msg-706232</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks Dust,<br />
<br />
I did replace the belts under the rebuild.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
<br />
Steve]]></description>
            <dc:creator>stevo1957</dc:creator>
            <category>Prusa i3 and variants</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 06:44:57 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706210#msg-706210</guid>
            <title>Re: X and Y step values</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706210#msg-706210</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ belt stretch is also a possibility]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Dust</dc:creator>
            <category>Prusa i3 and variants</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706190#msg-706190</guid>
            <title>Re: X and Y step values</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706190#msg-706190</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I hear what you are saying mate, but the same hardware was running in the Sunholkey acrylic frame and I needed X and Y steps of 80 to get the scaling right.<br />
<br />
Same hardware in a different frame, and I need to reduce X and Y steps to get the scaling right.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
<br />
Steve]]></description>
            <dc:creator>stevo1957</dc:creator>
            <category>Prusa i3 and variants</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 03:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706147#msg-706147</guid>
            <title>Re: X and Y step values</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706147#msg-706147</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Because the hardware has some tolerance.<br />
For example, step angle might be reported being 1.8°, but step accuracy is +/- 5%<br />
So the real step angle is something between 1.71 - 1.89°<br />
<br />
I'm guessing your real step angle is above 1.8°, so you need less steps/mm]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Veesta</dc:creator>
            <category>Prusa i3 and variants</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:23:03 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706128#msg-706128</guid>
            <title>X and Y step values</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?406,706128,706128#msg-706128</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi guys,<br />
<br />
I started with a Sunhokey acrylic framed i3 clone and it had X and Y step values of 80.5 to get the required scale in the printouts.<br />
<br />
I have just completed a rework using Emotiontech's prusa i3 rework V1.5 and now to be able to get correct scale in my printouts, I needed to reduce my X and y step values to around 75.<br />
<br />
I'm interested to know why I needed to do this.<br />
<br />
My pulleys, stepper motors and belt pitch has not chnaged (although I did replace the belts) so the mathematical equation to arrive at the step values still holds true, but I am required to have lesser values otherwise my prints come out bigger than they should be.<br />
<br />
I have my scale correct now but am interested in why my end step values don't reflect the calculation based on the hardware used.<br />
<br />
Should I worry about it?<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
<br />
Steve]]></description>
            <dc:creator>stevo1957</dc:creator>
            <category>Prusa i3 and variants</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:26:56 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
