Motion unit development This thread is split up from the main thread. Down below you'll find previous discussions about the concept. [quote=atmark] I'm currently designing a bracket for the HP4 bldc servo motor and the spool, and I wanted to share my tests so far. The bracket is meant for the ODrive D5065 motor. My goal is to design a single motion unit, that includes the motor, a belt tensioner and the spool system in one rigid frame, which I probably am going to lasercut out of sheet metal. For now, I'm still thinking about the spool system. If you look few posts back in this thread, there was a discussion about the constant radius of the spool and how to compensate the line build up. An idea I had, was to route the line in a small groove in the middle of the GT2 spool, in the way that the belt is pressing it against the spool as you can see in the last pic. I just tried to block the spool from rotating and pulled the line as hard as I could and it didn't move at all :D It's still too early to say this concept works, but it is a promising start. It might be, that constant line movement is going to bite into the belt and it fails that way. You'll never know. What I'll do next is rerouting the end of the line onto a second spool, which I most likely will attach onto the same spool axle. And that spool will rotate independently from the first one. I was also thinking to spring load it, so that the excess line is always spooled up as the line moves. [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/hH0cRpo24ebHqKgxVxaNHHXSsBXy9OlvTWlvVMkMTBTUWmaCp6Y9dKtqRVM8IRmD7cGUtZ3C5KBeCIYtItBDtmTg0PPlAUO0Ujbb7SFkT1-3Cyw8fw9csRWhi622t_KEbiI9bruCaj4WZIZeuIcXi4NAr6e6Tofw2lscOgzTVKciWwdmE4eSOzBwuuf-6PClEfc8a69qg3M8qV29ND8pK8HbeUPM6HB-6jyCqLCH5AA0b9uJC_u16ZtysosC7G3hZP5RDFsTo_SJqt7vI1kagHck0fBA5bP70tpalHz8_72RxrV9qARCX0j5AQtjb6D3xCwPW5QI5IBpa2suQbYID8_qnqj5OqgP-iYYu7rFOb9mwRLCKzuXngI4VoyARxAmXBjkX6cW7T2yCLDXhBjOQNwFdn7JfSx_b-ikYTymTZRcC925L1Tt8goaiWPkcrsUcEcGfhifxidVJkB0NhfVffHdpF6XSEfpSijvAGqKpoNAmLHpc_UcrrdUVaY-ktdlMYH4Vbmmb2I3wvQSCyO5p6BNC96zy8Jvr29laLqXpkCz4q7CQctkH9cyOLdO5IjYgvGkM3aEHgs5FQQ4zqpKLNKLdp1rY1u6q2ulp26Iqv4rLoYs7tXb-7RztoqUO1reADk6W8LE3Z8ORweHbpdGqSf9K5edk7j7kCfCy06GRFFdUUxQWdNSiKrG6wXficGjnPReoNEyz9FcythjNVuELYxOll54_TuzYnETq4lhcFt6OIcgTA=w2645-h1214-no[/img] [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/xno2Vzmmj7DR2TLkhTJeRRpEDizYsIqPKYW9D9C36cbKshRWQ_WUhiHrDPafyVBjT2Z0SYuZNyoNua5R_XAWCpLpR6FJ9TiAdDThwnYymvvyIjZkmDLdu7ANhK6iU15JdlJ7gr9ZuM-WiIi9WyAznjysZa7ROVjegETVl_I7Pf3f7r7w_QvGIfWEgY7_7wSi9FTUhmx3mjYR4KWUuccQ_2IQDtBIS3DjdVrcYUdjhZZcjd2texK8W2RKFJ7QRLWT0Kbh23i2RJV0OPfg-7XuIbkkkNubqelekR7xzDaL7of_obd_6JWbe4Q0ueASKW8glIjZAcTtwxblVRVRopg6VDMtWdzF14UOuKbYTVzFYlr-b_GFrf6J_aB_VI6_4ziMfpsmnf9YhAqEo36GZtPutZkKzPuqxsB0SQpgWF-oPZkElGjBelx5S02Y6B0CzIz6vWRw4NnI9IBZInanupCtI6Xvwk6nhoa2Vo2EkufUoYR_27a6-83I0FNKrhIHHqDzevBI81M0gYOytuoagPcnqUmcELHKJZVc5h2szTfi_gqZeJ80jhHzgcMDSYVzy-lTOLLArJP_WjVeDWSabsyOfx-3Q5S0Ct5-HugnHhL3p-67A0Jju_LOs_8zw0qAMMB3OxdlfkpgcG3jX0Mlpd2MOOx47Mg1dEJdMMGGiTfFbVrarEWuoclGPe4zebZpcV9Twpr9U-Nnz8CC__0fYELqs8gY8vxk55_1ogN6alhGpFUs_qVkyQ=w2645-h1194-no[/img] [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/85jZVRU_X1wBJbENkXyhab8Fxws9SQ2fIxofL2vP5DDauzcfX-AnsAMzuwO4tb93hOdlVpQeO7P5RNNFybZZhNRYiWRYo1on6Ro7XP2E4kyiGfQefsrgE5SmeTzgBYdZV_2f_yY5L09VD-VmluraZlfsJumXuj0HQ7hB5wpLSMA0_sD_KL0oC14gJ62mTWeeEO6HBquuwUH1RBFY-JMxvZbm21JFHCScAC-ZbEOHBJQFXv36pAw7gSXz25boyLvCcW1rsptcGoXrqgX3BAvhpD8520AcKEgO3gei6sKEJbKe26WmQoppXJJadWM2Wan8quDnHZr5jqc1jh61sG4Zprl05s8pIAPJgFomc6c1q_yXbE9BGMrFe9IQXBLDnW11bg-LMO1YP4_3LJX6qcRGd5utZWRBqtKpuret4w_DHwps-ss9-fr4ugUmNCkbgu3w2ekYjXPRwGm16ZIe85N-njnE1lwXws7VXhq7ypVwVuB7j8p0-0FQsDrOUK9YWtVzaO960o_Ego1rfbkOlRazwSpUzeyYy0K6JVtmrNOkPIk7xA6YAEr4mYK9VjoWPDX54HmwJEI2B4Yt7jf0VmEI2aRXJmo0Ya_aTlwtpMN5JI-FZrwM-BgNcRdnmpm0eOgjpfAP5djHbX3c7fVx02GIacyY0xl1Y_Meo17YgsJJvMLJuio0h-iNh8tPVpNFGfqPqDinvTs5o7r1iYcgOdoLa-8oHMUBnSBF97FjcqZJEwT0X2OTZg=w687-h1521-no[/img][/quote] [quote=tobben] Cool! Independent spool units are nice. If you can place them at the anchors (instead of having all several spools at one anchor), you will get less line flex, since there will be less suspended line in the air. Good idea to pinch the line under the belt. That might actually work very well =D You could pinch it for several rounds (along a helix groove), or just increase the spool radius, if one round of pinched line isn't enough. It might be a challenge assure zero slippage over time, since both line and belt will change properties as they get old/worn down. Some data on that would be super interesting, like accelerating a 5kg weight quickly up and down 1 m 10000 times or something. Using high accelerations would be interesting because the belt will flex/contract a bit when tension changes, and I don't know how it will affect the line. Hopefully very little. Anyways, that might be a very nice upgrade of the spool system :)[/quote] [quote=atmark] Thanks! I just put a heavy weight on the line and looked first if the line holds, and after I couldn't see any slipping, I bounced the whole system until the line snapped [url=https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipP941svHu60zA2lb4uy-EiuVIoL_OkNFKMXv9HkmQv1IpC6mATvBaFGsN7UJP3WJQ/photo/AF1QipOdquy9sI6ztk9QW4ccuoGtGpWLGjevc3XIrvNQ?key=MkJVWGdzUW9RWl9QNjZaaHVaQTVlc2VIOXpSeHhR]Video: testing slipping[/url] No slipping what so ever :D I believe the line should be able to handle 40 kg of drag, so friction-wise I can't see any issues. Obviously the long term failure rate is a question mark, but I think it might work quite well because the line isn't cutting radially into the belt. The only force is applied axially and the belt is pressed by the line by only 0,25 mm Your idea of hooking some weight on the line and do some repetitive acceleration testing sounds very good! I'll try to set up the electronics next week. What values would you suggest for weight, speed and acceleration? Here are also some close ups of the GT2 spool and the belt directly after the test. For the spool I used Octofiber PETG-CF. [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/rUEMcMkom-s9r8FHsZPkhq7qMtDZ8K4Jn_XWlQVDD4mcDtVDKx09kG09SMClPtKFT82oD88R7z2zfvC6hm2FSDQ9_jgur7vsQnuK7rQ-ewuI-KwFuz6Mz4e8hpj_QCX0D6GDzwFfvq18c2bKPdOq0iHSR--w_rm_Y8LuOxrIuF6TnpRXFazSf4SIi2bf-4a30sIFpbe5JDVo9t75p5NVXf7WArGXKrlxyFbvdMDarFTKEW2HQnm-tnBZpWGqIU1OCSyDjSB-ZiXi-CUo3c8iLnP856iJOEea0ne5ua5RzKupd9jJIWvjsp2wiDEbHNmK4DaRSK80pwDWrYWgJQXiycebgeWG1RtFcvJ5Du5PBpR3lLORIBaS6zkhz7WilmLzTXF2UgZNgBHcxUbuCtOzipk1tEXUqknnyNePJXbPC6Ub4Wl6f0mqRFU6bz5dVPHNZDboUwG8_imUD_JZyPmlSi6Mf11AErYXVlMzD-Alnu0Ae23mEoxDYjZNgUk_Q_d0jP6T0-CAXaya43Ulpq8xRq_ouwF5sgOIJ4QjKMQsmXCOH0SOOjg5zNuVTS-BmPe6YT8JyTNPFR37G-ajWInLf9aOQKWRYuvmjFUiqbGFQ8_sllBxpau-LqeGApvifPkqdmd4kZ3GdBb5amhTWDbtPtVI5k97PBBh4cf8u9MNmrtNxleodP8jrWU6aSVBiC-Pa8sltxpRv25SgoN93_YwHjHgJdNeKEJesaAFxC_mx0FnxWPUCQ=w687-h1521-no[/img] [img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/v9E4RAYRoc_I6qovWKVPFGAVAXsDAMpmFKNERhwNvgQzkbrz9xwChcjIkSsZcjS0wq5QT9JaSZsDzanW-q0ejN4WhdH6cMZqOFWFty01BnotXWbk0RdkcFSeH7kdvrlYZc2qujvHmkEp76WiudYO_05gx_k9fclXDXOLtmmg8h3mxiP6CYzvFsNGmuxYC9HbozLxOkMNIYp164UCRenNNvq7hBUhKfHK_-hAHWf_VMHOTXdrzWoZUbMDmvbTiVpmdlHh2U7pbNunkRqVctXPgzEg7eHDXYnIv2SvVGteshpQ08mo2HmnQLQfm7dGnbfBV14z2lpT0rZd--Da4M_GmY65QMs0oWr4blBFFwSYTfO5rMYDAVZ9869bQYBias1iVMNtBM-9K4f6uxjmF8PXBGLHZ3U7ryfhiNPV89k_zVBHLrrTwVmmeMPqra_HC5KRMX_qW82L2SHMxJdQmamVzen5ao12gpNdNLvZEJqjAl1EBDS89ss878Y5RV9nGo6JIvY65wRSAzCmDoMn1Bgf0Bh9S4T3chLcFHRd_jB7NOynv1HWf5GstQyOPEIPGFcL0Wzl7dedOBRNk8eVLkpYp_Vy6WpuayxzDQzzFeHVB-1Vv_nysom_fqmTlzu8p9ICxxTX1rDNm94fI7riYTCakMb45stkeetlgRtLFOcQXA2HbeFAinhJoOOX5XotstRxZEBV4dNDIihYvJCj-qmPypHpiJ1EuFRpJ0Bx-Mrs-LUNXufxEQ=w2645-h1194-no[/img][/quote] [quote=tobben] Woah, that's even more friction than I imagined. Impressive! CF enforced plastics have a quite rough surface. Where did the line snap? Was it the CF that wore down the line? Since I would be aiming for HP usage, I'd test numbers relevant to the application first. I'd use ca 50% more weight, speed and acceleration than my HP4 prototype is experiencing. So ca 5 kg of weight, accelerate 15 m/s² , up to 1 m/s. Use a distance of 1 m up and down, say 10k times. That's a 3h test. You could go crazy and just let it run all night if you're feeling confident ;) It would also be interesting to know if the mechanism works with pure PLA. A spool out of PLA printed hot (say 240 C) would give much less friction than the PLA-CF in your prototype, I guess. It would be interesting to know if it would still be enough, or if the CF is required. Images like the one you showed would be a very interesting part of the result. In particular, if the line does slip, I'm interested in how damaged the belt gets. Also interesting to know if a slipping line cuts into the spool. The mechanism is interesting in it's own right, so if the HP4 application proves to be well within limits of the mechanism, I would have done additional tests. Like, measuring a slowly applied force up until the line breaks or starts slipping, or until the plastic spool breaks. (Film a weight that is hooked onto a one end of a line, and pulled. Could capture both force and amount of slip/flex in one shot.) Abruptly applied force is also interesting (requires a high-speed camera, or a weight that can store a max value).[/quote] [quote=atmark] Yeah, I was quite amazed too to be honest. The line snapped 5 mm before the knot I made to hold the weight. So the CF spool didn't have any effect on the snapping. I'm aware of the abrasive nature of CF, so it's not said that it could not happen, but in this case it didn't. I can print a new spool out of PLA, no problem. It will be interesting to test it. Let's see how I can setup a test rig. The motion repetition won't be a big issue once I get to setup the ODrive board and Duet. Is the firmware easy to install? Then, I assume a simple gcode does the magic? Btw, I wrote you yesterday a mail, but it's still in my to be sent folder (I forgot that the schools network is down for maintanance for couple of days) anyway, I wrote that I ordered braided PE fishing line that is two-colored (yellow/black), so it has a repetitive weave pattern, which could be used for line length readout with a IR sensor, as black plastic does not reflect IR light very well. That's why the material of black plastic can't be identified in automated recycling. Different plastics reflect IR light differently. So, additionally to the mechanics I was thinking about position feedback via sensor readout. Whats your opinion on that? There was also some discussion about measuring the line tension. Could that be useful to integrate in the motion system? At school we have a quite big range of sensors and other electronic equipment for prototyping. You can check technIcal details at [url=https://www.seeedstudio.com/category/Grove-c-1003.html]Seeedstudio Grove[/url] You can hook these sensors very easy to arduino, rasbi, etc.[/quote] [quote=tobben] Yes, the firmware should be straight forward to install. Just use the Duet2CombinedFirmware.bin you find in the repo (https://gitlab.com/tobben/hangprinter/tree/version_4_dev/firmware/RepRapFirmware), and follow standard Duet installation procedure. Gcode should to the magic, yes :) Be aware that your ODrive configuration will affect the movements. Max acceleration, max speed, step size etc needs to be configured correctly in the ODrive firmware. There's an example that matches my specific motors here: https://gitlab.com/tobben/hangprinter/tree/version_4_dev/firmware/ODrive Follow the official ODrive documentation to find numbers that match your motors. If the fishing line has any flex at all, this will affect the readings. So if the line (and hence the pattern) is stretched out, you might wind in 10.1 mm when you thought you did only 10.0. On the other hand, since you're detecting the pattern, you'll know when you have unwound the same segment of fishing line, regardless of how stretched it was when wound and unwound. This makes the system immune to a family of errors where flex is "stored" on the spool when wound in under heavy load. The line will always be twisted though. How would the system cope with that? And how would it behave if the line got very slack? Could we route the line through a very thin transparent tube, to keep it from kinking under the sensor? For such a sensor to be useful, it would need to be very fool proof since so many weird things can happen during a print.[/quote] https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860731#msg-860731 Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:44:39 -0400 Phorum 5.2.23 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864977#msg-864977 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864977#msg-864977
Quote
atmark
Couple of interesting photos before the end of year! The mail-man dropped at last the dyneema line I've been waiting for.
Check especially the video! It reveals a distinctive pattern on two sides and perpendicular to that pattern a second pattern, that repeats itself every 5 mm.
Those patterns are formed by two reflective yarns that go through the braid in opposite directions.

The line is a 1 mm line with UHMWPE (dyneema) core and a polyester jacket.
It should be able to withstand at least 40 kg of drag. And it is, as advertised, stiff and round with a smooth surface, although the reflective yarn makes little bit wavy on the side. That might cause a pattern, similar to Z-wobble. But anyway, I bought this line for testing purpose. If the sensor readout works with this line flawlessly, I might tend to invest a bit more for a heavy duty dyneema rope 2-3 mm. Those are rated between 200-400 kg of drag.

I'm pretty convinced by this so far! Next year, I get back to business. Happy New Year!! :)-D





Close-up video

Let's hope the patterns on the rope don't leave any artifacts on what the machine is making!
]]> Ohmarinus Hangprinter Tue, 31 Dec 2019 09:00:13 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864975#msg-864975 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864975#msg-864975 Check especially the video! It reveals a distinctive pattern on two sides and perpendicular to that pattern a second pattern, that repeats itself every 5 mm.
Those patterns are formed by two reflective yarns that go through the braid in opposite directions.

The line is a 1 mm line with UHMWPE (dyneema) core and a polyester jacket.
It should be able to withstand at least 40 kg of drag. And it is, as advertised, stiff and round with a smooth surface, although the reflective yarn makes little bit wavy on the side. That might cause a pattern, similar to Z-wobble. But anyway, I bought this line for testing purpose. If the sensor readout works with this line flawlessly, I might tend to invest a bit more for a heavy duty dyneema rope 2-3 mm. Those are rated between 200-400 kg of drag.

I'm pretty convinced by this so far! Next year, I get back to business. Happy New Year!! :)-D





Close-up video
]]> atmark Hangprinter Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:07:33 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864934#msg-864934 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864934#msg-864934 tobben Hangprinter Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:42:12 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864931#msg-864931 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864931#msg-864931
Other ideas, like "endless belt printing" or "fluid support printing" or "tree-like supports", and many more too, were discussed in the forums, but not all were realized by time ...]]> VDX Hangprinter Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:12:31 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864913#msg-864913 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864913#msg-864913 atmark Hangprinter Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:53:50 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864734#msg-864734 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864734#msg-864734
Quote
Atmark
... the Hangprinter concept ...
I think Seil-Tripod is more similar to Tetra (than to Hangprinter). They both constrain xy-rotations with vertical parallelograms spanned up by lines, tool-head and anchors. They both also have three high anchors and no low anchors. Hangprinter constrain xy-rotations by having three low anchors, and constrains z-rotations with non-vertical parallelograms. Many other interesting setups have been described in the wider literature on cable driven parallel robots.

Cable driven robots in still haven't had the big breakthrough in usage that many anticipated 10-15 years ago. I don't know why, maybe I just haven't looked hard enough for it.

RepRap forums (and also blog) from the early days are real gold mines for ideas, inspiration, and for learning way-of-working within RepRap development. Clicking a knowledgeable user's name (like VDX), and reading all their posts is something I would do around the time when I made the first Hangprinter. I would also search the forum with Google searches like
cable driven site:forums.reprap.org

Highly recommended :)]]> tobben Hangprinter Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:07:26 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864494#msg-864494 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864494#msg-864494
Quote
atmark
The idea with the ball-gliders was something I didn't get completely. Did you mean ball bearings for routing the wires?

- no, it was meant for the (triangular shaped) toolhead, sitting upside-down on an iron plate (which is fixed to the ceiling) ... attracted with magnets to the plate ... and 3 balls in the edges were used as "rollers" ;)]]> VDX Hangprinter Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:58:48 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864480#msg-864480 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864480#msg-864480 I'm impressed, so you basically described the Hangprinter concept 12 years ago!?

The idea with the ball-gliders was something I didn't get completely. Did you mean ball bearings for routing the wires?

Quote
VDX
Re: Parallel-kinematics versus string-pod
December 04, 2007 09:51PM Admin
Registered: 12 years ago
Posts: 12,332
... by the way - by rethinking the wire-systems i realized, that this could be an extreme cheap'n'easy repstrap-basis ...

With some ball-gliders, magnets and a steel-plate (or a MDF-plate with an atached iron-sheet) above the wire-plane i can apply a toolhead, which is fixed through the magnets upside-down at the plate, glides freely around with the ball-gliders and is positioned by the wire-tripod.

With good magnets it's no problem to hold some kilograms upside-down, so the toolhead, the extruder/syringe and the support should be manageable ...

With a second wire-setup there could be a hoovering plate under the construction, which could be elevated in Z up and down, to complete the 3-dimensional repstrap.

Imagine a wire-tripod-repstrap fixed under the ceiling, which lowers the bottom-plate with the fabbing-process, so the ready parts comes down automatically and in idle-mode the aparatus is 'vanished' to a thin plate under the ceiling - maybe with some keen paintings on the bottom winking smiley

I estimate an extreme low count of mechanical parts and assembly-working:
- 4 driving motors: 3 for the wire-tripod, 1 for the elevator
- some meters of thin steel-wire
- basis-plate with iron-sheet (for the magnetic fixing)
- bottom-/elevator-plate
- 3 ball-rollers
- 3 strong NdFeB-magnets
- upside-down-tool-head with extruder and feeding
- rolls for wire-feeding
- some scrap for assembly ...

The electronic is the same (with 4 motors) and the software has an additive converter from X,Y- to {La,Lb,Lc},Z-paths, as mentioned in the post above ...

Viktor
]]> atmark Hangprinter Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:50:17 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864321#msg-864321 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864321#msg-864321 reprap.org]

This "3-fold wire setup" can too easily be updated/modified for 6DOF B)

[attachment 113717 Seil-Tripod1.JPG]]]> VDX Hangprinter Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:58:36 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864316#msg-864316 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864316#msg-864316
The Fraunhofer Institute has also some pretty impressive CDPR-machines.]]> atmark Hangprinter Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:15:38 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864311#msg-864311 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864311#msg-864311
[www.youtube.com]]]> VDX Hangprinter Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:07:27 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864308#msg-864308 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,864308#msg-864308 atmark Hangprinter Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:05:54 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,862049#msg-862049 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,862049#msg-862049
The current 6 mm wide GT2-belt allows two grooves at maximum. There are also 20 mm wide belts. Or maybe it could work also if the line winds only few times under the belt and then goes few times around the spool in "open" grooves?]]> atmark Hangprinter Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:39:46 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,862029#msg-862029 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,862029#msg-862029 these, or search for "ceramic eyelet" on ebay or similar) instead of fishing line guide rings on HP v4.

Since you're up to buy a lot I thought you wanted to know ;)

Would it work to wind the line around the spool two times, in that track between your GT2 belt?]]> tobben Hangprinter Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:52:38 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,862015#msg-862015 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,862015#msg-862015
The Fraunhofer Institute uses them in their IPAnema cable driven parallel robot. The pictures and concept images show a pretty solid approach and I think it is currently the best way to implement the motion system. But, there's a major misconception when it comes to scalability. The area of end-effector movement is limited by the size of the drum and at some point the inertia will restrict the speed. So, the helical drum concept is more suitable for systems with limited area of movement.

The Hangprinter concept on the other hand is scalable by definition, although it is currently also limited by the size of the spool and the amount of line. I'm still convinced that the parallel grooved GT2-spool will work, it just needs to have more grip. At the moment the line is pinched into a single groove and that's enough for lifting +5kg, but only at slow speeds. Next step: more grooves, more grip. I'll need to buy a bag full of fishing line guide rings :)


]]> atmark Hangprinter Wed, 06 Nov 2019 10:20:05 -0500 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861667#msg-861667 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861667#msg-861667
Quote
tobben
Interesting!

Is the length of each color segment ca 4 mm long?
If each impulse measures a color change, then the readout will be
4 mm * 150 impulses/sec = 600 mm/sec
Do I understand correctly how the sensor works?

Yes, the distance from one color to the next segment of the same color is approx. 4 mm. The sensor sensibility is tunable by a potentiometer, so you can set the threshold to trigger the sensor only when the yellow segment passes by. It is a simple IR reflection sensor. I've put it in a channel where no other reflections can disturb it. The line runs in front of the sensor in 5 mm distance.

Quote
tobben
Also very interesting to think about potential use during calibration.
Each axis' line buildup could easily be calibrated separately.

I'll try to come up with a solution where we could avoid the inaccuracies of the line buildup method. Either the line pinch method, or if it should fail, a drum with a helical groove. Anyway, the thing I was thinking about with the sensor was to have some kind of closed loop. Even though it would be course, it could be used for synchronizing the line winding with the motor encoders. Or for detecting snapped lines, line flexing or line slipping. And yes, of course for calibration.

I'm aware of the fact, that this isn't foolproof. The line rotation will affect the accuracy. My next idea was to have two sensor perpendicular to each other and some kind of comparison loop to check both readings. Another option could be the laser/led-sensor from a mouse. They are definitely accurate when the line has at least some texture, and I think it wouldn't necessary have to be the black/yellow pattern. I've been looking for a suitable Dyneema line for some time now. There are some guylines with Dyneema core and a polyester jacket. They have also reflective yarn woven into the jacket. It seems that the reflective yarn pattern goes around the jacket and that the pattern is shorter than the black/yellow pattern. The line rotation issue would also be a minor thing, since the braided jacket won't deform under load]]> atmark Hangprinter Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:40:47 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861660#msg-861660 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861660#msg-861660 VDX Hangprinter Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:31:53 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861656#msg-861656 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861656#msg-861656
Is the length of each color segment ca 4 mm long?
If each impulse measures a color change, then the readout will be
4 mm * 150 impulses/sec = 600 mm/sec
Do I understand correctly how the sensor works?

With a faster processor, we'll get plenty of impulse reads per second, I'm sure, so maxing out on sensor speed should not be a problem for this sensor.

4 mm is a bit coarse, but we could gear down (introduce mechanical advantage) between anchor and effector to increase precision.

Interesting to think about how the collected data could be used during print.
Say we want more line to go out through the sensor connected to line A, call it sensor A.
If there is some tension in line A, then we can simply turn motor A to let some more line through sensor A.
If that doesn't work, then we must move motors B, C, and D to pull line A.
In doing that, motors B, C, and D will also move the effector as well as the positions of sensors B, C and D.
There might be a way to pull B, C, and D so that they counteract each other and at the same time creates tension in line A, depending on which position we are in, how much the line flexes, and how much the motors get pulled out of position.

If we bail out on pulling in B, C, and D, then all we can achieve with the sensors is to detect that lines did not move as we expected.

Also very interesting to think about potential use during calibration.
Each axis' line buildup could easily be calibrated separately.]]> tobben Hangprinter Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:49:23 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861586#msg-861586 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861586#msg-861586
In the mean time I did some experiments with the black/yellow-striped PE-line I bought. It is twisted, so it won't work in the printer, but for testing the concept its perfectly suitable. So, I printed a small casing for the Seeedstudio IR-proximity sensor with a small channel to guide the line in front of the sensor. Then, I compiled the Arduino demo sketch from Seeedstudio for counting motor speed. And, it seems to work quite well! The fastest reading I could get was around 150 impulses/sec, which translates into 600 mm/s line movement. I think it can handle even higher speeds, I just wasn't able to pull the line faster.

There are couple of interesting dyneema ropes I found on Aliexpress.
1 mm UHMWPE reflective rope
1.8 mm UHMWPE rope

What do you think? Would these work with the Hangprinter?














Video: Pulling line through the sensor
]]> atmark Hangprinter Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:40:56 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861376#msg-861376 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861376#msg-861376
I see that you've got Duet<->ODrive UART plugged in.
I've done some work on that in the last few days (blog post coming I guess).
GPIO 5 on the ODrive is a tad noisy because of the circuit board design.
I used that pin for motor A/C direction signal, and started to notice a slight random-walk pattern on my prints.
Experiments showed that motor A and C accumulated an error of ca 1 degree per minute during print.

So now, I've moved motor A step to GPIO 1 and motor A dir to GPIO 2.
UART tx is moved to GPIO 3 and UART rx is moved to GPIO 4.
This fixed the issue.

To get the fix on your test rig (if you want/need it right away), you need to flash this firmware:
usart2 branch of ODrive repo
and set these pins on the ODrive:
odrv0.axis0.config.step_gpio_pin = 1
odrv0.axis0.config.dir_gpio_pin = 2
]]> tobben Hangprinter Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:51:51 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861311#msg-861311 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861311#msg-861311 JoergS5 Hangprinter Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:00:32 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861233#msg-861233 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861233#msg-861233 The rig is now ready. I made a secondary spool with a build in spiral spring. One end of the spring is fixed to the spool and the other end on the axle. The spring is pretensioned before the line is attached to the spool. That way it automatically winds in the line the first spool is feeding and vice versa. It works very nice, basically its the same wind in mechanism as in your vacuum cleaner.

I've also setup up the electronics and done some testing with weight on the line. First results are, that as I speed up the acceleration the line starts to slip. It might be necessary to have multiple windings on the first spool to buildup enough friction. But I noticed also that the GT2 spool's teeth profile wasn't that exact, so the belt didn't fit in perfectly all the way around. Gonna print another one with 0,1 mm layer height and slower print speed.



]]> atmark Hangprinter Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:17:50 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861012#msg-861012 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,861012#msg-861012 daltec.dk]]]> JoergS5 Hangprinter Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:30:13 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860972#msg-860972 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860972#msg-860972 Video: testing the motor

Next, I'm going to combine the motor bracket and the spool bracket into one single piece. I think it's bit easier to get the belt and the line deflectors aligned properly that way.

Btw, I've been thinking lately about a round timing belt instead of dyneema line or similar. That way we could be sure there won't be any slipping as the teeth would prevent it. There's no thing like round timing belt, but the next best thing that comes close to the idea is the ball chain on your basin plug.



Any thoughts on this?
]]> atmark Hangprinter Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:04:56 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860945#msg-860945 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860945#msg-860945 hangprinter.org]
(blog by tobben)]]> JoergS5 Hangprinter Thu, 17 Oct 2019 03:31:16 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860907#msg-860907 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860907#msg-860907
Ok, so far I was able to setup the rig, setup Duet and now I'm configuring ODrive.

I ran at this point into an issue while setting up the step_gpio_pin and dir_gpio_pin
Both will give me this error: "Attribute step/dir_gpio_pin not found"

Did you encounter something similar? Any advise before I dive into ODrive docs?




]]> atmark Hangprinter Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:05:58 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860868#msg-860868 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860868#msg-860868
Quote
atmark
...For now, I can confirm that the GT2 spool made of PLA can't hold the line, it slips under the belt no matter how tense it is.
So, the surface roughness of the PETG-CF is crucial.

If PETG-CF is so important for friction, you could print PLA in the inside and only the important outer surface with PETG.

One additional idea is the application of little industry diamonds on the surface. (a product in german: [prozesstechnik.industrie.de]) But it depends on the size of the diamonds whether you get more or less slippery. Little diamonds are used as lubricant also.]]> JoergS5 Hangprinter Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:30:33 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860857#msg-860857 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860857#msg-860857
Quote
JoergS5
@atmark

I bought the Zylon yarn now. If you have a test setup for me, I can measure the properties after receiving it.

Hey, that's cool!
I just need to build my test rig first. Also, I would need to know the yarn diameter once you can measure it.

For now, I can confirm that the GT2 spool made of PLA can't hold the line, it slips under the belt no matter how tense it is.
So, the surface roughness of the PETG-CF is crucial.]]> atmark Hangprinter Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:07:55 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860854#msg-860854 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860854#msg-860854
I bought the Zylon yarn now. If you have a test setup for me, I can measure the properties after receiving it.]]> JoergS5 Hangprinter Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:09:54 -0400 https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860784#msg-860784 Re: Motion unit development https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?423,860731,860784#msg-860784
Quote
atmark
Quote
VDX
... you can try with "high elastic" steel wires -- have some with outer diameters from 0,3mm upwards ...

That's interesting. Seems to be a kind of spring steel? Do you have a supplier and/or some material specs for me?

... the "sourcing" was some +25 years ago, so no list of the suppliers around -- but you can search for "bowden steel wire" or steel wire in general, as I did then.

Here some of the remnants with two named types (the 0,3mm wire is on the spool -- the others were from 0,5mm to 2mm in diameter):

[attachment 112973 Stahldraehte.jpg]]]> VDX Hangprinter Mon, 14 Oct 2019 02:59:48 -0400