<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Makerbot optimized Mendel print pattern</title>
        <description> I am hoping to finish my Makerbot Build next month .  My plan to to go into full serial production of Mendels.  My goal is to have 3 Mendels, and 1 Makerbot all going full blast producing Mendels.

Most people I see printing Mendels are printing 1 part at a time, but is that the most efficient way?  What I WANT to do is print my Mendels this way

-Segment my prints into 2 hour chunks.  Try to organize the parts into groups that 

-Utilize 90% plus of the print area on each print

-Figure out what is the most efficient number of Mendels to print at once.  Is there an advantage to printing 6 of 1 part at a time?

Since different parts have different tolerances for variation, would their be an advantage to using different aperture extrudes for different parts?</description>
        <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?88,30380,30380#msg-30380</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:04:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?88,30380,31289#msg-31289</guid>
            <title>Re: Makerbot optimized Mendel print pattern</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?88,30380,31289#msg-31289</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Many of the parts will take over two hours to print, so a lot of your batches will be only one part.  Many of the smaller parts you need multiple copies of.  I believe most people are using the Multiply tool in Skeinforge to print these parts.  That only leaves a few parts that can be printed in less than two hours and you only need one of.<br />
<br />
I try to avoid grouping prints that take more than 4 hours.  My machine is still new and I haven't gotten it super reliable.  The odds of a failure in a 6 hour build is high and all the parts on the bed would have to be junked (unless some are short).  Printing one object at a time reduces the cost of failures.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>mccoyn</dc:creator>
            <category>Let&#039;s design something! (I&#039;ve got an idea ...)</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:59:50 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?88,30380,30380#msg-30380</guid>
            <title>Makerbot optimized Mendel print pattern</title>
            <link>https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?88,30380,30380#msg-30380</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I am hoping to finish my Makerbot Build next month <small>.  My plan to to go into full serial production of Mendels.  My goal is to have 3 Mendels, and 1 Makerbot all going full blast producing Mendels.<br />
<br />
Most people I see printing Mendels are printing 1 part at a time, but is that the most efficient way?  What I WANT to do is print my Mendels this way<br />
<br />
-Segment my prints into 2 hour chunks.  Try to organize the parts into groups that <br />
<br />
-Utilize 90% plus of the print area on each print<br />
<br />
-Figure out what is the most efficient number of Mendels to print at once.  Is there an advantage to printing 6 of 1 part at a time?<br />
<br />
Since different parts have different tolerances for variation, would their be an advantage to using different aperture extrudes for different parts?</small>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>spacexula</dc:creator>
            <category>Let&#039;s design something! (I&#039;ve got an idea ...)</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:38:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
