EEVBlog rPrint Project January 22, 2016 01:49AM |
Admin Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,000 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 24, 2016 07:51AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,277 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 24, 2016 09:40AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 24, 2016 04:28PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,277 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 02:27AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 580 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 06:42AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,277 |
Being the code was written right by using C++ he surely could but remember it has very little checking in it so is just made for these purposes. How will those routines fair in the real world? Not certain but should be okay just never know. I would love to get those fast routines on a 2560 but honestly I am not certain what the 2560 uses for atol, atoi, atof etc...?Quote
Paul Wanamaker
I watched it through. It's a big feat, I hope it works.
I hope he publishes the test results on all the things he re-invented, including his fast code libraries. That will be progress one way or another.
Other than that, he's learned a lot, good for him!
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 07:29AM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 3,525 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 07:38AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 07:48AM |
Admin Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,000 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 07:51AM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 1,671 |
Quote
realthor
Hi MechaBits, the sarrus linkage has been tried before for lifting purposes in the 3d printing community (http://forums.reprap.org/read.php?185,450966) and several design variations have been proposed in the "Solutions for Wally" (a simplified version of the Compact Space Crank) or even this Delta Sarrus Linkage concept. But none of them address the further questions: how are they going to be moved, how are the dead spots addressed and what solution for reduction are they going to use and where will that fit in the 3d printer's volume.
- How would the sarrus linkage you propose be actuated? Would you put a motor at each elbow joint? That would be the only way to avoid dead spots/singularities.
- How would you gear down a stepper to obtain a resolution that is 3d printing acceptable?
- If you need a large red printing bed, you get to put the green pairs at the center of the red bed's sides, so you end up needing more than two green pairs, which will get it closer to my design above. This will also increase the need to put a motor at each green pair.
There has been one concept on this forum I really liked and that is Nic Stewart's Modified Sarrus Idea, which has a higher range of Z translation than the normal sarrus. The same thing I am trying to do with my design but the issue I am having is a simple way to avoid the ded points/ singularities in a simple manner. That I didn't find so far.
Thanks.
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 25, 2016 07:51AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,277 |
As most kickstarter ideas I doubt it but his fast ascii/string to math functions is what I really want to investigate. Saving clock cycles (if it works for our needs) is the biggest new thing on that printer imo.Quote
Dust
You guys are so negative..
it a prototype!
And I think it has lots of interesting ideas.
Is it practical?... far to soon to tell.
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 27, 2016 06:16AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 227 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 27, 2016 12:15PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 580 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 27, 2016 01:19PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Quote
karabas
BTW what is the lightweghtest extruder now proven to work?
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 27, 2016 01:45PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 3,525 |
Re: EEVBlog rPrint Project January 27, 2016 02:03PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |