Open Hardware helps build communities October 08, 2013 03:26PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 08, 2013 05:27PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 89 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 08, 2013 05:41PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 406 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 08, 2013 11:06PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 1,352 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 03:31AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 36 |
Without this - already achievable, but for the moment at an inaccessible cost - goal, the RepRap movement wouldn't have attract so many talented and enthusiastic participants to achieve the faster than usual progress made to date. My two printers purchased this year are already both out of date...Quote
NoobMan
a "machine that makes another copies by itself".
...but not for long.Quote
NoobMan
It gives the impression that it just copies itself very easily, coz they forgot to make note like "a ton of human labor required in the process".
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 07:10AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 134 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 08:11AM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 12:21PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,236 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 12:44PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Quote
For example, it is not transferable and not binding on third-parties.
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 01:30PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 406 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 03:10PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 661 |
Quote
Ninth Circuit- Vernor v. Autodesk (emphasis mine)
Autodesk retained title to the software and imposed significant transfer restrictions: it stated that the license is nontransferable, the software could not be transferred or leased without Autodesk’s written consent, and the software could not be transferred outside the Western Hemisphere. The SLA also imposed use restrictions against the use of the software outside the Western Hemisphere and against modifying, translating, or reverse-engineering the software, removing any proprietary marks from the software or documentation, or defeating any copy protection device. Furthermore, the SLA provided for termination of the license upon the licensee’s unauthorized copying or failure to comply with other license restrictions. Thus, because Autodesk reserved title to Release 14 copies and imposed significant transfer and use restrictions, we conclude that its customers are licensees of their copies of Release 14 rather than owners.
CTA was a licensee rather than an 'owner of a particular copy' of Release 14, and it was not entitled to resell its Release 14 copies to Vernor under the first sale doctrine. 17 U.S.C. § 109(a). Therefore, Vernor did not receive title to the copies from CTA and accordingly could not pass ownership on to others. Both CTA’s and Vernor’s sales infringed Autodesk’s exclusive right to distribute copies of its work. Id. § 106(3).
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 09, 2013 03:23PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 661 |
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 10, 2013 08:13AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,236 |
>Quote
For example, it is not transferable and not
> binding on third-parties.
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 10, 2013 08:46AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,236 |
>Quote
Ninth Circuit- Vernor v. Autodesk
> (emphasis mine)
>
> Autodesk retained title to the software and
> imposed significant transfer restrictions: it
> stated that the license is nontransferable, the
> software could not be transferred or leased
> without Autodesk’s written consent, and the
> software could not be transferred outside the
> Western Hemisphere. The SLA also imposed use
> restrictions against the use of the software
> outside the Western Hemisphere and against
> modifying, translating, or reverse-engineering the
> software, removing any proprietary marks from the
> software or documentation, or defeating any copy
> protection device. Furthermore, the SLA provided
> for termination of the license upon the
> licensee’s unauthorized copying or failure to
> comply with other license restrictions. Thus,
> because Autodesk reserved title to Release 14
> copies and imposed significant transfer and use
> restrictions, we conclude that its customers are
> licensees of their copies of Release 14 rather
> than owners.
>
> CTA was a licensee rather than an 'owner of a
> particular copy' of Release 14, and it was not
> entitled to resell its Release 14 copies to Vernor
> under the first sale doctrine. 17 U.S.C. §
> 109(a). Therefore, Vernor did not receive title to
> the copies from CTA and accordingly could not pass
> ownership on to others. Both CTA’s and
> Vernor’s sales infringed Autodesk’s exclusive
> right to distribute copies of its work. Id. §
> 106(3).
>
Re: Open Hardware helps build communities October 15, 2013 05:01AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 972 |