Thanks for sharing the info!
I am very interested in this material and requested samples for testing it, but did not hear anything from Protoplant so far.
Nevertheless, I must also say that the result of the test of the thermal strenght of the material is a a bit misleading.
First you said, that you did not follow the instruction on how to active the filler (using a waterbath). Heating the test objects on the heated bed, seems to be a different thing. The heat distribution is much different from a waterbath. So it is uncertain, if that method really activated the filler.
Secondly I would not have added a coin as weight on top of the bridges. The metal will store the heat of the oven and add thermal + mechanical stress to your testing objects, which may result in a very small fail -temperature-window.
It appears that the carbon PLA has no better thermal strenght than normal PLA. Which may be true, but I do not think that this setup could proove it.
So if there is material left, I would suggets to repeat the test following the test procedures that the company uses and see if their results can be reproduced.
Because the thermal strenght feature is the main reason people may want to buy this filament.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/23/2013 06:51PM by maboo.
Blogs:
Meine 3D Druck Abenteuer
[
3dptb.blogspot.de]
FLSUN Delta Drucker für Deutschland
[
flsun-deutschland.blogspot.com]
Books on 3D patents:
[
goo.gl] (english)
[
www.amazon.de] (deutsch)