|
Why not simplify ? March 24, 2007 04:40AM |

)
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 24, 2007 01:03PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,915 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 25, 2007 02:47AM |


|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 25, 2007 10:44AM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,915 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 25, 2007 05:45PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,487 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 05:20AM |

|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 05:47AM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 92 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 01:15PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,487 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 01:55PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,915 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 04:02PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,487 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 04:44PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,915 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 05:16PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,487 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 05:30PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,915 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? March 26, 2007 06:21PM |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? April 05, 2007 08:45AM |
Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 2 |
|
Re: Why not simplify ? April 11, 2007 08:12PM |
Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 550 |


|
Re: Why not simplify ? April 11, 2007 10:20PM |
Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 129 |
Keep up the experiments and nice find with the nozzle. How about a non mechanical switch like an opto isolator like we use on the limit switches, just an idea
|
Re: Why not simplify ? April 12, 2007 10:49AM |
Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 550 |


|
Re: Why not simplify ? April 12, 2007 07:40PM |
Admin Registered: 19 years ago Posts: 1,487 |