Welcome! Sounds like you have all the relevant skills. You'll be fine.
Sluark Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What are the length limitations, and why?
None, just a compromise between cost/time. There are a couple of repraps around that have larger build areas, but build time for really large models becomes an issue.
> Why belt drives?
Fast, cheap, accurate enough when using microstepping stepper motors. Leadscrews are certainly useable, but are more designed to push a tool through a resistive material, which belts would struggle to do. But reprap doesn't have much weight and is depositing a material, not pushing through it.
> How much torque can the common stepper motors used exert without issue?
Depends on the stepper motor. Here's the specs for the NEMA17 I use, which are the top end of torque needed for Mendel class repraps.
[
www.slidesandballscrews.com]
Here's the reprap wiki page on stepper motors: [
reprap.org]
> Why do some repraps have heated tables?
For keeping prints flat and allowing them to cool uniformly. The larger the print, the more likely it will warp. ABS is worse than PLA. I print PLA on blue painter's tape without a heated bed at the moment.
> What is up with the outdated CPUs being used for firmware? Has anyone been successful in building
> more powerful boards? Is there even a point?
Arduino is cheap, does the job and is well developed. The community will always welcome more powerful CPUs, but it will increase the complexity of software solutions, and there has to be a significant advantage to such a move to make the development worthwhile. Most CNC machines run on Centronics printer interfaces - and you call reprap backward?!
> When the G-code is programmed, do feed numbers
> represent the xyz travel as in a standard cnc? And
> does the s code dictate the volume of plastic?
Yes. But s code is used for command parameters such as heater temperature, e code is for extruder stepper motor control (mm of extruded plastic). Here's the reprap gcode wiki dictionary page. [
reprap.org]
> Basic plan at this point: I'd like my print
> envelope to be at least 2'x2' if not larger. I
> have no issue making the machine rigid enough for
> this. I'd like to use acme threaded screw drives
> rather than belt drives. I would like to be able
> to swap out the plastic printing head of a small
> router for finish work. I'd like my
> tombstone(table) to be capable of fixturing work,
> including but not limited to the plastic parts
> generated.
Sounds great. One of the principles behind reprap is self-replication, hence the use of plastic parts, but it is just one branch of fused deposition modeling (FDM) class printing, which is one branch of 3D printing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_printing). But there's no reason that they can't be built out of T-slot or converted router tables etc. Leadscrew will work fine, and are suited to multi-role machines. They may not have the speed of belt drive, which is approaching 150mm/s printing and 300mm/s travel speed. [
www.mendel-parts.com] Though it would shake my printer to pieces!
Hope that helps!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/16/2011 06:12PM by droftarts.