reece.arnott Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On the stepper tester 1.0 boards:
>
> It would be good if the header/link on the
> RepRapOneDarwin page was labelled "Stepper Tester
> v1.0 - Optional" to obviously signify that you
> really need this except for allowing good
> debugging.
done.
> The instructions don't have a linked BOM as do the
> rest of the instructions.
its linked in the big table on the main page... all the embedded BOM's will soon be replaced with the part lister website i've been developing.
>
> The pictures should be updated to show the stepper
> tester board rather than the stripboard version.
i updated the wiki page a bit, but i need to take better pictures. i'll try and get to that this week.
> Or at least I assume the polarity for the header
> doesn't matter. If it does, how do you tell?
nope, it doesnt matter.
> Using the UCB 1.21 version boards:
>
> I got my parts from mouser so my component C4 0.1
> uF ceramic capacitor is labeled as 100nF. It would
> be helpful if the BOM linked to from the UCB
> instructions said 0.1 uF / 100nF ceramic
> capacitor.
yeah, this could be a bit tricky. i'll see what i can do.
>
> On the UCB instructions under step 8 it says "GR
> and TG 2-pin connectors. TG: tab facing inside.
> GR: tab facing outside". To me this is still a
> little confusing and would be better as "GR and TG
> 2-pin connectors with the tabs facing inside for
> 1.2.1 board. (for 1.2 TG: tab facing inside. GR:
> tab facing outside as above)" Also haven't they
> been renamed to Tx and Rx on the silkscreen?
yes, i updated the instructions with version specific text. thanks.
> The holes for the Rx, Tx, min, max connecters are
> round but the pins for the connectors are actually
> squarish which is why they are so tight.
i'm making all the holes slightly bigger for v1.3
> "R7 and R8 allow the use of non-standard
> opto-switches and are usually not needed; replace
> them with wire jumpers. These can be conveniently
> obtained when trimming R2 or R4." Are these
> actually needed anymore? Can they just be written
> out of 1.3?
yup, we're eliminating them for v1.3. yay for simplification.
> Thats enough for today I think.
thanks for your suggestions. keep them coming.