FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 01, 2017 06:30PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 26 |
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 02, 2017 03:12AM |
Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 13,886 |
Quote
"\"1) Better compatibility, using chip FT232 alternative ATMEGA16U2."
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 02, 2017 05:53AM |
Admin Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,000 |
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 02, 2017 07:30AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 26 |
Quote
Dust
except the image has a huge chip for the usb/serial a ATMEGA16U2 (as used on real megas) is tiny. Guess they could use a larger chip package... but why would you...
I suspect that it is backwards, they are using a FT232 instead of a ATMEGA16U2 (and I bet its a clone, that windows will not work with)
But regardless nether is better...
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 04, 2017 05:28PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 126 |
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 04, 2017 07:36PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 26 |
Quote
JustAnotherOne
The FT232 can do "more" regarding serial communication then the ATMEGA16U2. So in this regard it is probably "better" whatever that means.
But then again the serial connection is just some millimeters long and fixed PCB traces. If the ATMEGA16U2 fails serial wise then it fails in the same way the atmega2560 does. That would mean that the "better" chip has a higher risk of failing.
Did anybody ever had problems with this serial connection? All the problems I heard of are with serial connections with really long lines and bad cables in a noisy environment. Or due to the extremely long interrupt service routines used in some firmwares.
In conclusion I would say that this claim is marketing with no real benefit in everyday life. But that is just my experience,...
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 05, 2017 04:18PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 06, 2017 01:37PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 126 |
Re: FT232 vs ATMEGA16U2 March 08, 2017 01:16PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 3 |