Maybe I am missing something big.
I really can't understand the differences between tilt and mesh compensation.
Both compensate raising Z in accordance o the probed Z height.
If I understand correctly tilt can only account on a continuous deviation along all the bed , mesh take in account local differences generating a map of "hills "and "valleys" along the bed , so the Z correction isn't constant.
If it is right , why someone should go for tilt compensation?
Thank you and excuse me for the dumb question.
Andrea
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/16/2019 06:53AM by claustro.
