Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1

Posted by johneato 
Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 15, 2015 12:56PM
Updated a few days ago to latest zpl software and web interface. The prints are excellent and I really like the new web interface.Everything seems to work via the interface except for the layer statistics, which remains on layer 1 for the duration of the print. The first layer time is updated and displayed and is more or less the same time as the print duration. Filament usage and estimates are all updated correctly. The layer statistics have worked very occasionally, and worked for an whole print. But stubbonly refuses to work at all now. Tried it with Firefox and chrome, same result.
Firmware 1.08f
Web interface 1.06
Generated by: Simplify3D Version 2.2.2
Any suggestions please.
John
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 15, 2015 01:36PM
i think ZPL has a bug in his webinterface atm(he will fix it in the next relese) ,when the first layer hight is 0.5mm it doesnt not detect layer change. Also Repetier Host does the same thing with any layer hight.
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 15, 2015 01:38PM
Hi John,

there is a known issue with the first layer height detection if your first layer is greater than or equal to 0.5mm. Can you share a sample G-code file?
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 15, 2015 02:16PM
Quote
there is a known issue with the first layer height detection if your first layer is greater than or equal to 0.5mm. Can you share a sample G-code file?
Hi zpl

That now makes complete sense, and also explains the apparent intermittency. The prints where the layer statistics doesn't work, are prints with rafts, no raft and the layer statistics display normally.
I have extracted part of the gcodes from a couple of print files.

The first doesn't work and has a raft

G90
M83
M106 S0
M140 S70
M190 S70
M104 S200 T0
M109 S200 T0
G1 Z5 F200 ; lift nozzle
G1 X-10 Y50 F2000
G1 E-3 F2000
G1 Z0.562 F1000
; layer 1, Z = 0.5625
T0

The second does work and has no raft

G90
M83
M106 S0
M140 S70
M190 S70
M104 S200 T0
M109 S200 T0
G1 Z5 F200 ; lift nozzle
G1 X-10 Y50 F2000
G1 E-3 F2000
G1 Z0.216 F1000
; layer 1, Z = 0.216
T0

If you want a complete gcode file I am happy to supply it. Thanks for your prompt reply.
John
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 18, 2015 11:49AM
I'm honestly surprised you manage to get the filament to stick when using a first layer height of 0.56mm. I wanted to increase the threshold to 0.55mm in my next fw release, but I'll rather go with 0.6mm now that I've seen your G-code smiling smiley Thanks again for sharing that excerpt!
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 18, 2015 02:11PM
Quote
zombiepantslol
I'm honestly surprised you manage to get the filament to stick when using a first layer height of 0.56mm. I wanted to increase the threshold to 0.55mm in my next fw release, but I'll rather go with 0.6mm now that I've seen your G-code Thanks again for sharing that excerpt!

It does stick and the raft works really well when printing ABS. This seems to me to be a default setting in Simplyfy3D when selecting a raft, I can't see where it can be adjusted. Unless someone can point me in the right direction. Thanks for accommodating the changes.
John
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 18, 2015 02:45PM
Quote
zombiepantslol
I'm honestly surprised you manage to get the filament to stick when using a first layer height of 0.56mm. I wanted to increase the threshold to 0.55mm in my next fw release, but I'll rather go with 0.6mm now that I've seen your G-code smiling smiley Thanks again for sharing that excerpt!

ZPL

May I suggest you go even larger than 0.6. I have been known to print with a 0.8 or even 1 mm first layer when using a E3D Volcano hotend with 1.2 mm nozzle (When I want really fast print's they can even be stronger but obviously with less precision).

Doug.

ps I will be using DC42 Firmware on a delta with your Web i/f and then also on a CoreXY
Re: Web Control 1.06. stuck on layer 1
May 18, 2015 03:25PM
Ah, even bigger then? In that case I'll consider introducing a new G-code for this purpose, that way I can leave it to the user to set the nozzle diameter if it's larger than the stock one.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login