Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42

Posted by dc42 
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 12, 2015 03:30PM
Quote
Firefox3D
Yes sorry for derailing, I just wanted to to know exactly how the print quality differs with the newer firmware.

Dario, is the Z support print with the standard 0.5mm head and speed settings?



with the new firmware probably I have to change some settings.... movements and speed seem different ....
I got good print with 1.08b-zpl too...I did not yet understand exactly what has changed
back to previous the printers are working fine...
for the Z support ...yes ...0,5 standard speed (50% of the speed on the first layer only)

Dario


Ormerod 187
Firmware Electronics: Duet 0.6
Firmware Version:1.18.1 (2017-04-07)
Web Interface Version:1.15a
Slic3r 1.2.9a and Simplify3D 4.0.0
[www.dropbox.com]
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 12, 2015 03:46PM
I think I might be seeing what is more buildup on corners and angle changes, as thought it is accentuating the edges of the triangles in the model.

**edit** might be the current filament I am using, just trying something else and this stuff is "stringy"

But can you still suggest a ballpark change to the M556 line?

Thanks

Jon

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/12/2015 04:03PM by Firefox3D.
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 12, 2015 04:24PM
Quote
dc42
Quote
Ormerod187
Hi dc42,
too many quality problems ... back to previous It seems much better.

Hi Dario, what quality problems are you seeing?

I have had a number of users saying that print quality is better using my 1.00 and later firmware, compared to RRP, zpl, and my pre-1.0 series. I have also had some reports that my later versions slow down more when changing direction by less than 90 degrees. This is entirely possible, because my 1.00 and later firmware honours the settings for maximum instantaneous X and Y speed change when changing direction, but the other builds do not.

If you think that slowing down more when changing direction is affecting print quality, then you can always increase the allowed instantaneous X and Y speed change, using the M566 command. In my fork, these do not affect the minimum printing speed.

Hi dc42,
my config is M566 X600 Y600 Z30 E20
this is correct?
I'm printing this model for testing [www.thingiverse.com]
[www.dropbox.com] (previous print)
With your last I got this print correctly [www.dropbox.com]

I'll post some...

today i have Ormerod 187, bamboo and 2 color with 1.08b-zpl (2015-03-24) the last reprinted black with 1.09a-dc42 (2015-05-17) and the orange with 0.78k-dc42

Dario

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/12/2015 05:01PM by Ormerod187.


Ormerod 187
Firmware Electronics: Duet 0.6
Firmware Version:1.18.1 (2017-04-07)
Web Interface Version:1.15a
Slic3r 1.2.9a and Simplify3D 4.0.0
[www.dropbox.com]
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 12, 2015 07:41PM
Dario, you could try doubling the M556 X and Y parameters to 1200 to start with.



Large delta printer [miscsolutions.wordpress.com], E3D tool changer, Robotdigg SCARA printer, Crane Quad and Ormerod

Disclosure: I design Duet electronics and work on RepRapFirmware, [duet3d.com].
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 06:52AM
Quote
dc42
Dario, you could try doubling the M556 X and Y parameters to 1200 to start with.

Hi dc42,
I'm testing....M566 X1200 Y1200 Z30 E20

Thanks
Dario


Ormerod 187
Firmware Electronics: Duet 0.6
Firmware Version:1.18.1 (2017-04-07)
Web Interface Version:1.15a
Slic3r 1.2.9a and Simplify3D 4.0.0
[www.dropbox.com]
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 07:57AM
Hi Dario,

1. After some more testing, I've now increased the defaults to X1800 Y1800.

2. I found a bug in the Move code that causes the printer to slow down more than necessary sometimes. It's fixed in the 1.09b release candidate, which you can get at [dl.dropboxusercontent.com].



Large delta printer [miscsolutions.wordpress.com], E3D tool changer, Robotdigg SCARA printer, Crane Quad and Ormerod

Disclosure: I design Duet electronics and work on RepRapFirmware, [duet3d.com].
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 10:35AM
Quote
dc42
Hi Dario,

1. After some more testing, I've now increased the defaults to X1800 Y1800.

2. I found a bug in the Move code that causes the printer to slow down more than necessary sometimes. It's fixed in the 1.09b release candidate, which you can get at [dl.dropboxusercontent.com].

As usual thanks a lot!

Dario
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 01:14PM
I fine tuned the filament settings last night for some cheap filament I bought for test printing, it turns out it prefers a much lower print temp. However the part of the accentuation of edges remained, as if the head was moving too slowly so a build up occurred.

That new firmware and the increase in the M566 has produced a much crisper print for me, thanks Dave.

Jon

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2015 02:06PM by Firefox3D.
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 01:53PM
Quote
dc42
Dario, you could try doubling the M556 X and Y parameters to 1200 to start with.

M556 S78 X0 Y0 Z0 ; Put your axis compensation here
M566 X1800 Y1800 Z30 E20 ; Minimum speeds mm/minute

just not to confuse

Dario


Ormerod 187
Firmware Electronics: Duet 0.6
Firmware Version:1.18.1 (2017-04-07)
Web Interface Version:1.15a
Slic3r 1.2.9a and Simplify3D 4.0.0
[www.dropbox.com]
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 02:07PM
Sorry typing error corrected
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 03:49PM
Quote
Firefox3D
..Did you add a stronger better brace to connect the Z to the Y axis?...

Not my printers, saved the pictures from The Stupidly Tall-merod tread:

[forums.reprap.org]

..my two printers still have the stock Z-axis hight but yes I did secure the connection between those axis on both, pulling the extrusions tight together with a 4mm screw, changed the z-foot for an aluminium one and added a "set square plate" in between the two extrusions





Erik
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 04:14PM
Hi Erik,
if I remember correctly the taller-one! the strongest! Ormerod
I never understand why you open with "The Stupidly Tall-merod"
It's a good opportunity to print models so high...drinking smiley

unfortunately I have no other space available..... for a delta too
[3dprinterplans.info]
The new firmware it's OK for Delta too.


Dario

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2015 04:48PM by Ormerod187.


Ormerod 187
Firmware Electronics: Duet 0.6
Firmware Version:1.18.1 (2017-04-07)
Web Interface Version:1.15a
Slic3r 1.2.9a and Simplify3D 4.0.0
[www.dropbox.com]
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 13, 2015 05:04PM
Quote
Ormerod187
Hi Erik,
if I remember correctly the taller-one! the strongest! Ormerod

Hi Dario

Not necessarily, not if the smaller one is named David and got a slingshot :-)

Quote

I never understand why you open with "The Stupidly Tall-merod"

I did not name the tread, "static65" did that, I'm all for expanding the printer in any way possible, Ormerod to the Mooon! :-)

Quote

I's a good opportunity to print models so high...drinking smiley

Yes I could do with a bit more hight as you can see from this horror print where I, on the fly while printing, had to loosen the screws and carefully lift the upper z what-ever-its-called thingie to finish the print - and still it left the poor girl with a solid dent in the upper command center





Erik
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 14, 2015 04:24PM
Comparision pic of old vs new firmware with part of the standard "owl" test smiling smiley

The creases in the "wood" are about 1mm max at the edges, with the previous 1.09a you can see buildup and glitches the new one on the right is considerably better.

[www.dropbox.com]

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2015 04:27PM by Firefox3D.
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 14, 2015 04:33PM
I'm glad the changes improved things. I have now released 1.09b, see the thread I just created. I am now using M566 X1800 Y1800 Z30 E20 on my Ormerod and I think there may be scope for increasing the X and Y values further.

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2015 04:47PM by dc42.



Large delta printer [miscsolutions.wordpress.com], E3D tool changer, Robotdigg SCARA printer, Crane Quad and Ormerod

Disclosure: I design Duet electronics and work on RepRapFirmware, [duet3d.com].
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 14, 2015 04:45PM
If you go higher with the M566 X and Y values can you get other problems - undershoot? or actually break something eye popping smiley

Thanks again btw, as I said better prints are just a bonus to the fast homing, got real tiring waiting for it, especially when I forgot and left a homing action in the g code so it did it twice.

Forgot to say I did a test print at 100% and the ones in the pic are at 150%, no discernible difference.

Also with the newer firmware when it did the small moves the motor sounds stayed constant whereas with the older ones it sounded strained as I guess it was slowing down.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/14/2015 04:51PM by Firefox3D.
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 14, 2015 04:48PM
Quote
Firefox3D
If you go higher with the M566 X and Y values can you get other problems - undershoot? or actually break something eye popping smiley

If you go too high with the M566 values you will eventually start getting missed steps. You will probably hear that something is not right if this happens.



Large delta printer [miscsolutions.wordpress.com], E3D tool changer, Robotdigg SCARA printer, Crane Quad and Ormerod

Disclosure: I design Duet electronics and work on RepRapFirmware, [duet3d.com].
Re: New experimental firmware 1.09a-dc42
June 15, 2015 09:23AM
Quote
Ormerod187
Quote
Firefox3D
Are you talking about finding the right settings and lost time through failed prints?

No .... 2 days just for waiting the slicing!
Try a statue 350mm. taller with a high definition.... and take a break at sea!

Dario

Slic3r will take ridiculously long to slice if you tick the "avoid crossing perimeters" box. Leave that unticked and the time becomes sensible even for large models.

Dave
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login