Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 16, 2016 10:58PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 93 |
Quote
msaeger
[www.thingiverse.com] with a belt instead of the gears.
If you don't want to try and build it from scratch this guy is selling it ready to go. I bought a different design from him and it was good. [www.ebay.com]
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 02:28AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 85 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 06:07AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 131 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 08:13AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 130 |
Quote
marc2912
Quote
flatlander
Quote
marc2912
I noticed someone else mention it on here. I have an E3D with the stock extruder. I had to remove the aluminum block that sits under the extruder that the heat block screws into. I was going to upgrade my extruder to this from ebay but the block isn't removable and I won't be able to attach the hotend. What are people running with an E3D that is NOT a bowden extruder.
I purchased this on a recommendation from our Folger Tech thread here. I ran into the same problem, the hotend tube does screw into the bottom of this device and it probably would feed filament into the hotend. There were threads on the in-feed;I would drill out and the countersink that hole.It looked like it could transfer heat to the extruder stepper. It's for another day when I feel more adventurous. It's buyers remorse with a lowercase b. I did print out the instructions and folded them into the box.
It does say this, "Reduce the wiredrawing problem when working for remote feeding." Now that would make sense if it was a welder, but I'm not feeding any wire into my 3d printer.
Thanks with a stock hot end with an e3d it's even more pain as I'd have to mill part of the lower section away and find a way to fasten the hot end. Obviously not happening hence why I'm looking for people direct feeding e3d.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 08:27AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 130 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 08:51AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 130 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 10:48AM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 430 |
Quote
Bert3D
Quote
msaeger
[www.thingiverse.com] with a belt instead of the gears.
If you don't want to try and build it from scratch this guy is selling it ready to go. I bought a different design from him and it was good. [www.ebay.com]
Doesn't that extruder design cut off some of the vertical print height?
It would seem better to have the motor off to one side or to the front.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 11:56AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 85 |
Quote
flatlander
Mine came with threads on top not the fine little hole you have...hence the need for a fitting up top.
[attachment 74765 AllMetalFeed72dpi.jpg]
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 11:59AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 131 |
Quote
jhitesma
Quote
flatlander
Mine came with threads on top not the fine little hole you have...hence the need for a fitting up top.
[attachment 74765 AllMetalFeed72dpi.jpg]
Yeah, that's a little different. Could probably print a little adapter to screw into that. Or use a bowden fitting, I'm guessing that's why it was designed like that so you could run a tube off either end.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 12:04PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 10 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 01:48PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 285 |
Quote
UltiFix
Has anybody here upgraded to bowden? And is it worth it?
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 01:53PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 85 |
Quote
Toxic0n
How accurate are the printing estimations in Repetier/Slic3r?
When I was printing at 0.4 and 0.3mm layer height, I thought they were pretty close.
Printed these Z mounts at 0.2mm for the first time last night and the ETA said 2:44 and it took over 5 hours? 60mm/s printing speed. On the flip side, they look good!
[imgur.com]
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 02:17PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 92 |
Quote
UltiFix
Has anybody here upgraded to bowden? And is it worth it?
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 02:37PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 10 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 03:02PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 430 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 03:06PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 477 |
Quote
Toxic0n
How accurate are the printing estimations in Repetier/Slic3r?
When I was printing at 0.4 and 0.3mm layer height, I thought they were pretty close.
Printed these Z mounts at 0.2mm for the first time last night and the ETA said 2:44 and it took over 5 hours? 60mm/s printing speed. On the flip side, they look good!
[imgur.com]
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 05:07PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 314 |
Quote
iamquestar
Quote
UltiFix
Has anybody here upgraded to bowden? And is it worth it?
I did. It was not worth it IMHO.
My goal was to lighten the hotend, to increase speed. I haven't been happy with some of the high speed tests I've done, so I'm still printing at the same rate. In addition, I had to mess with feed rate and retraction settings A LOT to get back to where I am reasonably happy with the results, however I had to drastically shorten the bowden tube before I was happy with how it was doing.
Initially I had the extruder mounted on the back of the frame, behind the left-hand upright. The tube ran out the back, then up and over the top bar to the hot end. Total length was probably around 60 cm or so. I could not get retraction settings dialed in with this. I think where was just too much slop introduced in that long of a tube.
I moved the extruder to the top bar, thereby cutting the length of tub to less than half of the original. This works MUCH BETTER. (I'll post a pic later when I get home) I am reasonably happy with the results, HOWEVER changing filament is a PITA.
All that being said, I am seriously considering going back to mounting the extruder to the X carriage. I did the v-slot upgrade, but got a bad gantry plate. The wheels don't tighten up all the way against the rail (just a little play, maybe .1mm). I contacted Open Builds and they admitted they had a bad batch of plates, with errors in the hole spacing. They are sending me a new one, so since I'll have to tear it all apart anyway, I think I'll be switching back at that time. I am thinking about going with one of the belted extruders, with a NEMA 14 motor to keep the weight down... But we'll see. I'm getting to the point where I want to stop messing with the printer, and just to be printing with it.
It's about time to move on to my next project: Either a CNC mini mill, or a laser engraver/cutter.
Honestly I guess I will just stick to direct for now... Im thinking of doing dual extruders, which I think would be a LOT of weight on the x axis... So maybe 1 bowden, and 1 direct drive.Quote
Mach
Quote
UltiFix
Has anybody here upgraded to bowden? And is it worth it?
I upgraded to bowden and it work pretty well for me. Some people have mentioned that they do not like bowden because the retraction settings are difficult to perfect.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 17, 2016 05:34PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 85 |
Quote
SteveRoy
From what I understand the slicers don't take acceleration/deceleration into account when estimating the times.
I usually use [gcode.ws] for a better estimate
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 12:37AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 276 |
Quote
SteveRoy
Quote
Toxic0n
How accurate are the printing estimations in Repetier/Slic3r?
When I was printing at 0.4 and 0.3mm layer height, I thought they were pretty close.
Printed these Z mounts at 0.2mm for the first time last night and the ETA said 2:44 and it took over 5 hours? 60mm/s printing speed. On the flip side, they look good!
[imgur.com]
From what I understand the slicers don't take acceleration/deceleration into account when estimating the times.
I usually use [gcode.ws] for a better estimate
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 08:33AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 32 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 09:32AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 131 |
Quote
Boffster
Bookmarked! Thanks for the link!
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 12:22PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 2 |
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 12:24PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 131 |
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 12:34PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 314 |
What about 90 vs 100Quote
marc2912
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
It seems that FT had a bad value for the threaded rods hence the issue there, it's been a reoccurring topic on this thread. 4K is correct.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 12:50PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 131 |
Quote
UltiFix
What about 90 vs 100Quote
marc2912
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
It seems that FT had a bad value for the threaded rods hence the issue there, it's been a reoccurring topic on this thread. 4K is correct.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 03:02PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 130 |
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 03:04PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 93 |
Quote
marc2912
Quote
UltiFix
What about 90 vs 100Quote
marc2912
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
It seems that FT had a bad value for the threaded rods hence the issue there, it's been a reoccurring topic on this thread. 4K is correct.
If you really tune everything the numbers won't be 80, 80 4000, 90 anyways, it could be he actually tuned his printer accordingly.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 03:09PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 131 |
Quote
Bert3D
Quote
marc2912
Quote
UltiFix
What about 90 vs 100Quote
marc2912
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
It seems that FT had a bad value for the threaded rods hence the issue there, it's been a reoccurring topic on this thread. 4K is correct.
If you really tune everything the numbers won't be 80, 80 4000, 90 anyways, it could be he actually tuned his printer accordingly.
Actually after tuning my extruder the E steps was 100.89, so it is pretty close to the calculated 100 steps. I'm not sure why 90 either.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 03:14PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 314 |
So the last number (90) is the extrusion multiplier?Quote
marc2912
Quote
Bert3D
Quote
marc2912
Quote
UltiFix
What about 90 vs 100Quote
marc2912
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
It seems that FT had a bad value for the threaded rods hence the issue there, it's been a reoccurring topic on this thread. 4K is correct.
If you really tune everything the numbers won't be 80, 80 4000, 90 anyways, it could be he actually tuned his printer accordingly.
Actually after tuning my extruder the E steps was 100.89, so it is pretty close to the calculated 100 steps. I'm not sure why 90 either.
I'm closer to 110 but I think my extruder gear has a low spot in and it skips a tiny bit every revolution. looking to change it out.
Re: Folger Tech 2020 i3 Printer Kit (Official Thread) March 18, 2016 03:25PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 93 |
Quote
UltiFix
So the last number (90) is the extrusion multiplier?Quote
marc2912
Quote
Bert3D
Quote
marc2912
Quote
UltiFix
What about 90 vs 100Quote
marc2912
Quote
jag
My FolgerTech 2020 i3 printer was working great except for 2 issues. Prints were 4% short on the Z-axis, and on some prints it was clear that filament volume was too low. I fixed both my changing DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h
Here's my question: Why does the firmware on the FolgerTech Google drive have these settings: {80,80,3840,90} ? My printer works much better with what seems to be 'normal' settings {80,80,4000,100} for this printer design.
I have this resolved, just curious about the settings published on the Google Drive
It seems that FT had a bad value for the threaded rods hence the issue there, it's been a reoccurring topic on this thread. 4K is correct.
If you really tune everything the numbers won't be 80, 80 4000, 90 anyways, it could be he actually tuned his printer accordingly.
Actually after tuning my extruder the E steps was 100.89, so it is pretty close to the calculated 100 steps. I'm not sure why 90 either.
I'm closer to 110 but I think my extruder gear has a low spot in and it skips a tiny bit every revolution. looking to change it out.