Re: Motion unit development December 18, 2019 12:05PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 96 |
Re: Motion unit development December 18, 2019 02:07PM |
Admin Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 13,986 |
Re: Motion unit development December 18, 2019 03:15PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 96 |
Re: Motion unit development December 18, 2019 03:58PM |
Admin Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 13,986 |
Re: Motion unit development December 22, 2019 06:50AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 96 |
Quote
VDX
Re: Parallel-kinematics versus string-pod
December 04, 2007 09:51PM Admin
Registered: 12 years ago
Posts: 12,332
... by the way - by rethinking the wire-systems i realized, that this could be an extreme cheap'n'easy repstrap-basis ...
With some ball-gliders, magnets and a steel-plate (or a MDF-plate with an atached iron-sheet) above the wire-plane i can apply a toolhead, which is fixed through the magnets upside-down at the plate, glides freely around with the ball-gliders and is positioned by the wire-tripod.
With good magnets it's no problem to hold some kilograms upside-down, so the toolhead, the extruder/syringe and the support should be manageable ...
With a second wire-setup there could be a hoovering plate under the construction, which could be elevated in Z up and down, to complete the 3-dimensional repstrap.
Imagine a wire-tripod-repstrap fixed under the ceiling, which lowers the bottom-plate with the fabbing-process, so the ready parts comes down automatically and in idle-mode the aparatus is 'vanished' to a thin plate under the ceiling - maybe with some keen paintings on the bottom winking smiley
I estimate an extreme low count of mechanical parts and assembly-working:
- 4 driving motors: 3 for the wire-tripod, 1 for the elevator
- some meters of thin steel-wire
- basis-plate with iron-sheet (for the magnetic fixing)
- bottom-/elevator-plate
- 3 ball-rollers
- 3 strong NdFeB-magnets
- upside-down-tool-head with extruder and feeding
- rolls for wire-feeding
- some scrap for assembly ...
The electronic is the same (with 4 motors) and the software has an additive converter from X,Y- to {La,Lb,Lc},Z-paths, as mentioned in the post above ...
Viktor
Re: Motion unit development December 22, 2019 09:58AM |
Admin Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 13,986 |
Quote
atmark
The idea with the ball-gliders was something I didn't get completely. Did you mean ball bearings for routing the wires?
Re: Motion unit development December 27, 2019 10:07AM |
Moderator Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 401 |
I think Seil-Tripod is more similar to Tetra (than to Hangprinter). They both constrain xy-rotations with vertical parallelograms spanned up by lines, tool-head and anchors. They both also have three high anchors and no low anchors. Hangprinter constrain xy-rotations by having three low anchors, and constrains z-rotations with non-vertical parallelograms. Many other interesting setups have been described in the wider literature on cable driven parallel robots.Quote
Atmark
... the Hangprinter concept ...
cable driven site:forums.reprap.org
Re: Motion unit development December 30, 2019 12:53PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 96 |
Re: Motion unit development December 30, 2019 04:12PM |
Admin Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 13,986 |
Re: Motion unit development December 30, 2019 04:42PM |
Moderator Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 401 |
Re: Motion unit development December 31, 2019 08:07AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 96 |
Re: Motion unit development December 31, 2019 09:00AM |
Admin Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 3,096 |
Quote
atmark
Couple of interesting photos before the end of year! The mail-man dropped at last the dyneema line I've been waiting for.
Check especially the video! It reveals a distinctive pattern on two sides and perpendicular to that pattern a second pattern, that repeats itself every 5 mm.
Those patterns are formed by two reflective yarns that go through the braid in opposite directions.
The line is a 1 mm line with UHMWPE (dyneema) core and a polyester jacket.
It should be able to withstand at least 40 kg of drag. And it is, as advertised, stiff and round with a smooth surface, although the reflective yarn makes little bit wavy on the side. That might cause a pattern, similar to Z-wobble. But anyway, I bought this line for testing purpose. If the sensor readout works with this line flawlessly, I might tend to invest a bit more for a heavy duty dyneema rope 2-3 mm. Those are rated between 200-400 kg of drag.
I'm pretty convinced by this so far! Next year, I get back to business. Happy New Year!!
Close-up video