QuoteMils24 Im pretty sure Haydns are what you are looking for. Go to Thingiverse,search for 'Zero-Backlash Magnetic Ball Joint Rod Ends' and drop Haydn an email. I got the dimensions from Haydn and they are longer than those in the picture that I thought they would fit my setup. However, I checked again and I can make them work, just need to have more care than before. The duet3d and the Ultby shadowphile - Delta Machines
Hi, I can't find the source for these kinds of neck-less ball studs: The stud needs to be M3 and the ball 3/8" (preferred, but I will take 10mm) thanksby shadowphile - Delta Machines
Hi David, you said at one point in the past that the auto-probe results printed to the console of the web interface do not reflect the impact of the H parameter offsets, which means it can report worse than it actually is. If that is true, is there a reason why that can't be different? It's awfully misleading. thanksby shadowphile - Delta Machines
Hello, after custom machining my effector and carriages I am now frequently getting .01 mm auto-levels on a machine with a 300mm print space, which I am pretty happy with. However, the Traxxis rod-ends are definitely the weak link (no pun intended!) and I'm looking at alternatives. The magnetic ball approach seems popular and easy to make accurate but I just don't trust magnets and shudder when Iby shadowphile - Delta Machines
I just ran across this model ultibot delta and realized at one point there was no bowden tube. My biggest complaint about deltas are the bowden tubes. The have multiple disavantages and my biggest peeve is unable to use soft filaments. So..how does this machine get away with doing something that opposes the biggest advantage claimed for deltas? (I also read recently that deltas don't have the laby shadowphile - Delta Machines
edit: I just realized this is not a .85 board and I should be using those instructions. What a dolt!by shadowphile - Duet
Thanks. Apparently I need to know HTML or something , which I don't.by shadowphile - Duet
Ah, have not seen that before. (how does one link to a subsection of a page?) thanks to all This command also includes dive height and probe speed so this is really great!by shadowphile - Duet
We seem to be on different planets Your link goes to the home page for the reprap gcode reference but not to anything specific. I also did not see anything there using a 'T' parameter except Tower Radius in the G30 command. What is the gcode I am supposed to look up? thanksby shadowphile - Duet
There is nothing in this command about speed and I can't find any other g-code that references this parameter. I inserted 'G1 F10000' before each G30 command but it made no difference. I seem to remember having access to these parameters somewhere (but that might be from my RAMPS days). QuoteUsage G30 Xnnn Ynnn Znnn Annn E R I D T S U Parameters Xnnn X coordinate Ynnn Y coordinate Znnn Z coordby shadowphile - Duet
During G30 commands I want to speed up those traverses, can't find a button or g-code anywhere, can you help? thanksby shadowphile - Duet
This is all good to know! I thought just hammering them in was a little brutal but figured that was expected. Some of my rods seem a little loose now, how much printing wear can they take before they start to stretch? I have had a few high-speed (70mm/sec) 10-hour jobs but otherwise my machine sees very low usage.by shadowphile - Delta Machines
dougal1957, you are protected by the Good Samaritan law I was not aware that the H parameters would not affect the bed-leveling routine report, that changes a lot for me! With that obstacle removed I can move forward to rebuilding my carriages also as they are a frankenstein of cut-up printed parts, polycarbonate blocks, and wooden shims (blegh!).by shadowphile - Delta Machines
Thanks Dougal; I feel like I should have put this in the Duet forum. ; Auto calibration routine for delta printers ; Before running this, you should have set up your zprobe Z offset to suit your build, in the G31 command in config.g. M561 ; clear any bed transform, otherwise homing may be at the wrong height G31 X0 Y0 ; don't want any probe offset for this G28 ; home the printerby shadowphile - Delta Machines
I have a 300mm bed and the autoleveling routine was getting around 0.02mm deviation. But my machine warped out at some point and I decided to hell with these printed parts... I built a new effector platform from only machined aluminum parts, and assembled to within .02mm or so in all dimensions. This thing is tight! I ran around to each bed probe point to measure and record the offset-from-tilby shadowphile - Delta Machines
(Note: printer specs at the end) Hi, I have been printing PLA ok with my large-format delta for a while. It has an E3D 3mm extruder and up to now have always used a .4mm nozzle and 'play it safe' speeds of 30 mm/sec. However, I had a high-volume part about 6" by 6" that would take way too long with my usual setup. With some tweaking I was able to print at 70 mm/sec with a .6mm nozzle, although mby shadowphile - Delta Machines
I recently upgraded to this version as reported here: Firmware Name: RepRapFirmware (CoreNG) Firmware Version: 1.11 (2016-04-14) Web Interface Version: HTML: 1.11, JS: 1.11 I noticed when retracting the filament 100mm moves were only moving 50. The only thing I can think is I have 'half-z' option turned on. Then my first prints were horrible: even at 350% thickness on the first layer (using setby shadowphile - Duet
okey doke. already rewired it and it works fine. thanksby shadowphile - Duet
Quotedc42 If it's connected to the E0 endstop input then you can use M574 E0 S0 or M574 E0 S1 to select the trigger polarity. I can't get this to work. M574 w/o parameters reports E as active high or low wrt to my setting but G30 S-1 always triggers on active high. I have tried this with M558 P1, P2, and P4, and various combinations of M574 E0 or E1 with S0 or S1. I have tried a few of these byby shadowphile - Duet
there is no mention of E in the description of M574by shadowphile - Duet
Thanks. That little bit of info should be added to the reprap gcode page because that is the first place I looked.by shadowphile - Duet
I built an opto-interrupted z-probe that goes low when triggered, but I can' find any way to invert the trigger logic. I tried P1 through P4 of the M558 commnad. When I built the circuit I thought I could simply invert the logic to match my hardware. Right now it is tied to the E0 limit switch because I was set up for an IR-probe. Any help? thanksby shadowphile - Duet
I have had this problem for a while. Cycling power of the Duet or restarting the browser do no fix it. The only fix for me seems to be rebooting the PC. Sometimes I get it to connect but some of the readings do not update such as z probe and temperature. My setup: -Direct connection through an ethernet switch. -Static IP -12V power -Several other PCs on the network: one is accessible through thby shadowphile - Duet
Quotedc42 Quoteshadowphile Why are the limit switches even turned off? Leaving them on would at least prevent the sideways crashes at high Z... Checking the limit switches on every step would significantly slow down the step generation. It's on my list to apply soft limits at high Z. I don't understand. Limit switches can drive hardware interrrupts, no overhead at all.by shadowphile - Duet
That is some really nice printing and engineering, congratulations! You have inspired in me that my biggy-Kossel build can give higher performance. I have a few questions that might help me with my own construction: My Design Duet running on a 1M tall 350mm bed with 300 build zone, 300mm 500W silicone heater under 3mm borosilicate glass, black thermally-conductive double-sticky tape from heaterby shadowphile - Delta Machines
Quotedc42 Quoteshadowphile dc42, I have have good luck using your software in general but I have some suggestions and questions and observations: (I just upgraded to 1.11 and have no interest in the wifi option. Too much wifi noise in my home from other devices.) A) For small parts I have a macro called bed_small that probes just a local set near the center of the bed, to save time and reduceby shadowphile - Duet
I have observed that at some points the head moves down fast until close to the bed, then goes slow until triggered. Some other points don't do the fast step, just drift down at the low speed all the way. Slows the auto-cal process somewhat. My config.g parameters have all been tweaked to match the values that were reported after a cal process except rod-length (I use S6) Also, is here any wayby shadowphile - Duet
dc42, I have have good luck using your software in general but I have some suggestions and questions and observations: (I just upgraded to 1.11 and have no interest in the wifi option. Too much wifi noise in my home from other devices.) A) For small parts I have a macro called bed_small that probes just a local set near the center of the bed, to save time and reduce the amount of bed-surface pby shadowphile - Duet
Nevermind, I discovered the firmware file I uploaded was way too small and therefore busted somehow. I re-downloaded it and it looked ok and now I can ping my printer!by shadowphile - Duet
My previous version (1.09 something) worked fine. I upgraded to 1.11 today, as well as the latest SD card contents. Now I can't even ping the duet board. I have ensured the config.g file has the same static IP I used before.(and other IP info). How can I identify if the config.g file is loading? (or whatever other problem it might be) thanksby shadowphile - Duet