I think printing a cylinder is not the best way to calibrate a delta, I'm struggling a bit with this my self. I have found this: and this: Now both those are for Marlin and I have not yet been successful, but as I understand now I got the instructions somewhat wrong and have not found the time to redo. Hope it helps.by Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotethevisad Yeah that stuff goes into marlin main to be processed, your changes should be reflected on the print using the new firmware now. I see. That explains it. Thats how it is beeing new to stuff, but it's great to learn.by Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotethevisad QuoteKoenig I'm in the same situation myself and I've found this: It also seems one of my towers is a bit off, my prints come out a bit skewed. I thought getting the aluminium-corners would help against this, how wrong one can be... And still no heated bed above 90C, think this has something to do with the RAMPS (Duet underway) Koenig, check out the latest version of the firmwaby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotejanpenguin Increasing length of diagonal rod reduces printing size. Decreasing length of diagonal rod increases printing size. New_diagonal_rod = measured_length / target_length * old_diagonal_rod For example, you print a 50.00 mm x 10.00 mm x 10. 00 mm cube. Quote1st iteration Measured length of the cube is 49.80 mm in X when diagonal rod is 203.00 mm. New_diagonal_rod = 49.80 / 50.00 *by Koenig - Reprappers
Quotejculver09 QuoteKoenig Quotesungod3k EEPROM disabled? Nope, as I wrote, I used M666 (endstops), M206 (Z-hight) and M665 (deltaradius) for bed-level calibration. Or do you mean I have to disable it for it to work? But then I would loose my bed-calibration, and the ability to use the M666 to calibrate it again...? I am not that great with the software so I will try to explain best I can. Thby Koenig - Reprappers
Quotesungod3k EEPROM disabled? Nope, as I wrote, I used M666 (endstops), M206 (Z-hight) and M665 (deltaradius) for bed-level calibration. Or do you mean I have to disable it for it to work? But then I would loose my bed-calibration, and the ability to use the M666 to calibrate it again...?by Koenig - Reprappers
So I've been using M666 (endstops), M206 (Z-hight) and M665 (deltaradius) to calibrate bed level and is fairly pleased with it for now. But my prints are dimensionally inaccurate so I have followed this guide: Printed a 50% version of the asterisk he links to on that page and from how I understands it you should measure each line starting closest to a tower and moves away from it in a straightby Koenig - Reprappers
Quotetadawson Crazy idea, but an easy test. I take it your electronics are under the bed, correct? Try laying the printer on it's side, and perhaps a small fan blowing at the RAMPS card, and see if it will heat. A bad solder joint set off by thermal expansion could cause your thermistor to glitch. If that works, edit pins.h and put the thermistor in question (E0) on the unused thermistor input. Yby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotellamatrails QuoteKoenig Could be firmware as well. "Heater_ID: 0" that is the extruders hotend right? agree on that? It doesn't matter what temp the hotend is, I've tried having it at room-temp or heated to 235C (also read in pronterface, reported by marlin) but when the bed-temp reaches ~80C I get that error, sometimes before 80 sometimes after. Highest reading I got from the bed was 89.by Koenig - Delta Machines
Also what do you guys says about this: The dimensions are way off here, much more than a small tower displacement.... It is supposed to be an asterisk with the diagonal lines running parallel to each tower, with a horizontal line through the centre. The firmware I'm using is 1.0.3 dev from 2015-06-09. EDIT: Don't think too much about the look of the extruded plastics, I just laid some out rby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotetadawson QuoteKoenig Quotetadawson QuoteKoenig Quotematthew900 I'm not sure what motors I have. I used the aluminum corners which will act as heat sinks so I'm not sure how much heat they are generating. I have my steps at 80 and the z axis is coming out perfect. It is the horizontal plane in the x/y axis that's oversized. Which adjustments in the configuration will only impact the x/y planby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotetadawson QuoteKoenig Quotematthew900 I'm not sure what motors I have. I used the aluminum corners which will act as heat sinks so I'm not sure how much heat they are generating. I have my steps at 80 and the z axis is coming out perfect. It is the horizontal plane in the x/y axis that's oversized. Which adjustments in the configuration will only impact the x/y plane without changing the z aby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotematthew900 I'm not sure what motors I have. I used the aluminum corners which will act as heat sinks so I'm not sure how much heat they are generating. I have my steps at 80 and the z axis is coming out perfect. It is the horizontal plane in the x/y axis that's oversized. Which adjustments in the configuration will only impact the x/y plane without changing the z axis? Thanks! I'm in theby Koenig - Delta Machines
I have seen the limitations of the 8bit electronics first hand just about an hour ago. I issued a travel-command in pronterface just: G0 F8000 C0 Y0 Z5, and the motors were stuttering like hell, first I thoguht there was something mechanically wrong, bad rails (again), something stuck in a motor or something like that. But just lowering the travelspeed did the trick, I have 1/32 steppers and thby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotetadawson How do you know you are at 80? Is that coming from Marlin, or are you reading it yourself? My first guess would be that your thermistor is defined incorrectly, or plugged in to the wrong port . . . . but neither of those would explain why you get a mintemp error (set at 5 by default) when the temp should be rising . . . - Tim Coming from Marlin, reported to Pronterface. Not 80 exby Koenig - Delta Machines
When trying to heat up the bed I get this error when I reach about 80C: "Error:MINTEMP triggered, system stopped! Heater_ID: 0 Error:MINTEMP triggered, system stopped! Heater_ID: 0 Error: Printer halted. kill() called! Error: Printer halted. kill() called!" Any ideas what it could be? "Heater_ID: 0" isn't that the hotend? why do I get a mintemp triggered on that when the bed reaches 80C....by Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotebluesmike Quotebluesmike Quotebluesmike Ok I have a weird issue that Im having a hard time figuring out. Small print jobs print fine but large print jobs the head lifts on one side of the job and stays about an inch above the bed. So lets say that the object is 180x50x20. The print job will start at y90,x-90 and start to move to y-90,x90 after the head passes y0,x0 it steadily lifts until itby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotetadawson Quotemmcginnis9272 Quotetadawson Using something like Pronterface, enter '100' in the length box, and hit the 'extrude' button . . . . Others should be similar. Considering that there are multiple printer interface packages, myself, I can't fault Folger for not documenting things they didn't write, sell, support, or ship . . . And, unless the drive gear on your extruder is a diffeby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotejculver09 QuoteKoenig What I gather from this thread is that the extruder included in this kit is no good so I'm thinking of getting an "all metal" extruder, like this: Would that be a good choice or does anyone have a better recommendation? As far as the extruder, I am still using the original hotend, only issue I have is that changing filament is a PITA because internally things dont lby Koenig - Delta Machines
What I gather from this thread is that the extruder included in this kit is no good so I'm thinking of getting an "all metal" extruder, like this: Would that be a good choice or does anyone have a better recommendation? Quotematthew900 Well we finally got everything together, uploaded the 20 tooth firmware with the Arduino program, but we're getting an error in Pronterface. We get a bunch ofby Koenig - Delta Machines
I finally got some life into my kit! Everything works but calibrations left to do. I'm thinking of getting the Duet as well so I'm curious how it goes for you thevisad.by Koenig - Delta Machines
QuoteDjkingsley QuoteDjkingsley Quotethevisad Created a github repository which will contain all of the changes we come across here and I will try to keep it in sync with the official repo. Those who wish to use it or update it with me, feel free to contribute. TheVisad Beat me to it, thanks, one less thing for me to do. There is an issue with the ENABLE_AUTO_BED_LEVELING, in SanityCheck.h neaby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotetadawson Yeah, that's why Linux is embedded in 100's of enterprise class computing products . . . . and Windows is rarely seen in that space any more . . . From routers to tier-1 storage, it's everywhere . . . A major aerospace vendor . . . . all flight sims are on Linux, as are development desktops . . . . yeah, there is proof of your point . . .a company that could afford *anything*, andby Koenig - Reprappers
Quotetadawson History tends to show that this is false . . . . and the incentive is wanting the best without bending over for it. - Tim Not so sure about that, I venture to say that most software used by proffessionals is not open-source. And when there is money in it, people can really dedicate their time to the development instead of just having it as a "hobby". But I'm definitely not bashiby Koenig - Reprappers
QuoteFloyd QuoteKoenig There is "Simplify3D" wich I've heard some good things about. Im sure he is looking for a free slicer and not a $150 slicer... They wouldnt even give a free trial to see if I like it before blowing 150 bucks! Might be he was, but he did mention, in the original post, a company that occasionally do charge for their products, so I would think my suggestion still is valid.by Koenig - Reprappers
There is "Simplify3D" wich I've heard some good things about.by Koenig - Reprappers
Quotetadawson QuoteKoenig Quotetadawson Folks say that, but using those values, my dimensions are very close, and any corrections I calculate would need to go in the opposite direction . . . . thus, I am not convinced that they are wrong . . . - Tim Several sources state that it should be 80 steps/mm with 20-tooth pulleys (EDIT: and 1/16 steppers). Try googling "steps per mm 20 tooth pulleys"by Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotedc42 If you change the motor steps/mm then you will have to adjust the other parameters in proportion to maintain the geometry. Off the top of my head, I think you will need to decrease the delta radius, diagonal rod length, endstop corrections and homed height by the same factor as you decrease the steps/mm. Sorry for the hijack, but I'm thinking about trying out your "Mini height sensor bby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotetadawson Folks say that, but using those values, my dimensions are very close, and any corrections I calculate would need to go in the opposite direction . . . . thus, I am not convinced that they are wrong . . . - Tim Several sources state that it should be 80 steps/mm with 20-tooth pulleys (EDIT: and 1/16 steppers). Try googling "steps per mm 20 tooth pulleys" and se what you get. I tby Koenig - Delta Machines
Quotecislom Is the only place I have to tweak the DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in configuration.h file? I think the default is 84mm (189/2.25 with the 20 step gears). i was going to tweak these out a bit, but i was wondering if there is another spot to do it, or if there are multiple spots? Thanks again everyone! It been up earlier in this thread that those values probably are wrong, 80 stepby Koenig - Delta Machines