Quotedc42 The reason why we use IDEs is that RepRapFirmware is no longer a simple project. There is no way I would be without some of the features found in all modern IDEs (except Arduino, which doesn't deserve to be called an IDE IMO), in particular the "Go to definition" and "Find all references" features. exuberant-ctags and vim (or emacs - not a fan but i know people are) have exactly thoseby lkcl - Ormerod
ok this is interesting, note on the right edge, where the printer's going in an arc, that's fine. on the corner: fine. but in the middle, where it's speeding up, that's where zagging occurs. soooo..... from this we can conclude that i'm either running it too fast or that there is lag on the extruder. i'll try backing it down to 250mm/sec speed, see if that helps.by lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotelkcl Quotephord I was hoping your redesign would include a useful extruder for 3mm ok i've _had_ to replace the metal arm with a printed one so that's now in the repository. testing it now. still didn't fix the problem i was having difficulties with skipping at a very specific angle - at least now it's a PLA part. what _has_ solved the skipping is splitting the extruder gear into two paby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
woooow. 28mm3/s at 350mm/s print speed. that's with the new 0.4mm nozzle, 1/4 micro-stepping, a 3.54:1 (46:13) geared extruder i had to make and 2.85mm filament. temperature is 230C (for PLA!). results came out like this: i've not taken the gear off the printbed yet. layer height is 0.2mm. the inner attachment on the left is at 0.15mm, the one on the right is at 0.2. i was getting fedby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
QuoteFA-MAS That's looking from the top down when it's in deployed setup? yehh it iiis, that's the timing belts on the right edge. i'll deal with this one later, i'm still arseing about with a 3mm geared extruder, have to have gears because 3mm PLA needs 3x the pressure: direct-drive doesn't cut it.by lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotephord I was hoping your redesign would include a useful extruder for 3mm ok i've _had_ to replace the metal arm with a printed one so that's now in the repository. testing it now.by lkcl - CoreXY Machines
ok, so it's all assembled... and we have one of those "argh" moments when you realise there was a lapse in concentration during the design phase of the corexy-to-boxframe attachments. the top CoreXY is now rock solid (so it's not such a big concern) but i'm not happy with myself at the mistake. basically you can see what the mistake is: i put a light underneath and have circled in purple whereby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotejstck Again, thanks for making this. I have very little patience for cranky IDE's and compilers, and this gets me right by the whole thing. i bought one of these boards because i like the idea of having a faster ARM Cortex (i normally use STM32Fs with libopencm3, and love the combination). i also liked the description of the RepRapFirmware being c++-based, it sounded extremely well-designeby lkcl - Ormerod
QuoteAx Quotelkcl QuoteAX Schlotzz's extruder works really well, it's what I run on the FB2020 combined with an E3D HobbGoblin drive gear. i assume? That's the one, was bought by accident, was left in the basket pricing things up along with a spare Lite6, so I thought I'd use it xD Quote I use 1.75mm as it's what the rest of my printers use, it doesn't really make sense for me to use 3mmby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
QuoteFA-MAS Sounds like is coming along. Pretty good for a first print. The bridge came out good. While the corner cubes sound like they'd help, It's been proven they reduce rigidity over connecting the extrusions directly to each other, but rather add extra parts (however insignificant). Connecting them directly like this would be more rigid Dentist's Post on connecting Extrusion. and requirby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotephord @lkcl Thanks! That works. Also explains why the folder looked empty on the web interface. yep Quote I'm interested in your extruder you ended up with because I'm also using 3mm filament. You're right that the simple FuseBox extruder doesn't work for it at all. :-( nope. it's designed for a MK8 drive gear, and the arm has a hole only for a 1.75mm filament (easily fixed with a 3by lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotepen25 looks good. congrats on getting this to work. thanks! Quote how well does it maintain print calibration when you fold it move it and set it back up to print? haha i haven't got that far yet i just had to take the box apart and the z-assembly today, to fit new attachments. i fixed two issues: first, the wing nuts kept jamming against plastic and metal, so i've turned them round anby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
phord, quick reply, that's git clone git clone \~lkcl//foldable3dsandwich200/.git - sorry! more laterby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotepen25 i have updated my BOM to include a few more things i have purchased. I am still under 400 USD but when i order some corner brackets i will be under 425. this isnt including a raspberry pi 3 for octoprint as it isnt needed. and i am thinking the L and t brackets can be left off as right now i am not seeing them doing much ahh that's a mistake. like, a really serious one. those misuby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
sorry FA-MAS, didn't notice your message, would have replied earlier QuoteFA-MAS Sounds like you're close to getting it running. I'd like to see its first prints. that's running at 200mm/sec with a 0.3mm nozzle (first one i've had - i can say now i really don't like them, i'm swapping out for a 0.4). you can see it's really nice at the top where cura slows down to get 5 seconds per layer, aby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
hi edvardas, ok so this is no worse than what i get on the mendel90 - these parts are only 2mm thick, but 230mm long and 10mm high. the print speed calculated by cura for the 300mm/sec x-y travel speed says 13.5mm3/sec. the opposite side is, ironically (being the inner of the part), much better. i think i have quite a lot more experimenting to do, nehby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
QuoteEdvardas Do you notice any under-extrusion while accelerating or over-extrusion on deceleration? I have noticed that this is a problem if I come close to extruding 10mm3 of plastic per second (which is widely considered the maximum). And with my 0.6mm nozzle and 0.3mm layer height that is already a very low 50mm/s maximum printing speed. Moving at 30mm/s gives great results and that is 6mmby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
QuoteEdvardas What do you mean by an "extrusion rate of 200mm/s"? hmmm, wrong units! it should be 200mm/min - thanks for noticing, edvardas, i'll edit that. i'm thinking ahead for revision 2, i might get one of the micron cobra hot-ends, they have a special "high flow-rate" kit, and the guy i spoke to there is regularly using his extruder at 250mm/sec which is pretty awesome.by lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotebani i am looking at designs here and on openbuilds. virtually 100% of them are bowden by design. it looks like the only ones using direct drive are from people who got frustrated with the original bowden design and converted to direct drive afterwards. i have a mendel90: i really, really like it, and i even didn't notice how loud it was until i did the first prints on the Sandwich200. aby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
Quotebani it's claimed here that corexy is sensitive to belt tension compared to other designs. anyone found this to be the case? what i found is that not having equal tension on both belts resulted in torquing the x-assembly . not correcting that would result in, obviously, all square shapes ending up as trapeziums! apart from the damage that it would do to the linear bearings to have theby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
it's working! still a work-in-progress but it is basically working and producing useable quality prints. i am currently testing 300mm/sec - there is a little bit of zagging (diagonal breaks on outer shells) - and in stand-alone tests i managed to get an extrusion rate of 200mm/min without skipping. to get that ridiculously-high extrusion rate i had to: reduce micro-stepping to 1/4 increaseby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
ok nearly completed: i found that i need to redesign the extruder as it is jamming. everything else is working, despite having to jury-rig a pair of voltage divider circuits to replace the faulty ones on the Rambo v1.2g. the extruder uses 3mm PLA because i have over 400 metres of PLA still which needs using up, from the mendel90 which this printer is replacing. hence, i have had to redesign itby lkcl - CoreXY Machines
okaaay, so to solve the problem with RAMBOv1.2g boards not working properly i've bypassed the two voltage divider circuits for heater and hotend, and created equivalents from components that i had immediately to hand: the dog's dinner on a 3x2 header with four resistors and two capacitors is a replacement pair of voltage dividers plugged into X-40. i've modified pins.h so that it uses ADC3 anby lkcl - Firmware - Marlin
hi in a different post i believed that there was a marlin firmware configuration issue so i posted in marlin, but after some investigation i believe it's hardware-related. i have CORRECTLY configured Marlin firmware 1.0.x, measured the thermistors to be 100k at 25C, yet they are BOTH - that's both the hotend AND heatbed - registering 40C in Marlin. that corresponds, according to the EPCOS NTC dby lkcl - Controllers
ok so a little more investigation, the voltage reading from TP20 is 4.59V and from TP22 is 4.58V at room temperature (appx 22 to 25C). the Semitech 104-GT2 thermistor for the E3Dv6 hotend is reading 116k, the NTC EPCOS B57621C104J62 is reading 106k - according to a datasheet for these thermistors if they're reading 40C they should be around 52k.... and they're not. any ideas on what might be wrby lkcl - Firmware - Marlin
ok so i removed one of the resistors and measured it stand-alone: it's reading 4.7k which is the *correct* value. which is very strange. next possible investigation, measure VCC and also the voltage across the terminals without the thermistor installed, see what that reads... update: VCC 4.98V, thermistor terminal to VCC: 0.19V.by lkcl - Firmware - Marlin
ahhh... according to this post: wrong readings can be caused by wrong pull-up resistors. so i measured the resistors R31 and R32 shown here and sure enough, they're both measuring 4.0k not 4.7k. i haven't measured the others yet, the board's still installed so is very awkward to get to. i happen to have some 4k7 0402 resistors so i will see what happens after replacing them, but.... argh...by lkcl - Firmware - Marlin
i've just compiled and uploaded latest stable marlin firmware (1.0.x) directly from the marlinfirmware repository and exactly the same thing is happening: both sensors are reading 40C when both resistors measure approx 100kOhms and the actual temperature in the room is around 23C. i have a mendel90 as well with pretty much exactly the same firmware, running on a Melzi, and that's reporting the cby lkcl - Firmware - Marlin
hi some advice appreciated: i'm doing a corexy folding printer, and using a RAMBO v1.2g with an E3Dv6 hotend. the configuration page for E3Dv6 says use TEMP_SENSOR_0=5, which i'm doing... and the temperature reads 40 degrees when it should be 25. with the thermistor disconnected the temperature reads 37.5 or thereabouts. also, the NTC EPCOS 100k printbed resistor (TEMP_SENSOR_BED=1) is the sby lkcl - Firmware - Marlin
Quotepen25 yea i didnt have any issues with the channels. and i took and measured belts from 4 different printers and they all measured 1.7 to 1.9mm thick and i was able to fit them into the 1.8mm gap. i will say though that the 1.7mm thick belt went in too easy so id probably use a bit of hotglue to secure the belt. and the 1.9mm belt took some coaxing. yeah that doesn't sound very sensible -by lkcl - CoreXY Machines