Forrest Higgs Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > nophead Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I can't see goinreverse's point. An exponential > > growth will always beat a linear one, it's just > a > > matter of time when it happens, why does it > matter > > when that is? > > > I'm notby abrannan - General
goinreverse Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > To me the whole print itself thing is a gimmick, > 80% by weight threaded rod... Design changes so > frequently there will never be enough printed > parts to go around. It's not a gimmick, it's a design goal. These machines are in their infancy, so to speak, and they're working under the open source mantraby abrannan - General
greenarrow Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >When someone first gets > a machine up and running I don't think they will > generally start to print parts straight away, they > will spend a bit of time printing things they have > been waiting to do, and experimenting until they > understand the machine well. After a few months > people are likely tby abrannan - General
Okay, coming into this late, but this topic tickled some ideas in my brain... As for grinding, what about a very slow cut. I'm thinking a mechanism like a paper shredder. Successive ones, of progressively smaller cut. It likely won't get us down to a dust, but I think it'll get down to small enough to feed into an extruder. As for the extruder, what about something like they use in candy maby abrannan - Plastic Extruder Working Group
The idea I had was to create a "indentured servitude" model. If I had a working RepRap/RepStrap (I don't) I would do something like this: You send me $X dollars for a set of RepRap parts (Where X = SUfficiently large amount of money to weed out those who aren't committed to actually making a RepRap in the short term)I print and send you a set of RepRap parts. You make your RepRap and print twoby abrannan - General