Talk:Diamond Hotend

From RepRap
Revision as of 21:03, 2 April 2015 by MrAlvin (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

sources?--Thejollygrimreaper (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2015 (PDT)

As far as I can tell, it is common practice for open source software businessses and open source hardware businessses to release source files together with the first shipment of a product. --MrAlvin (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2015 (PDT)


Also, of the reproducible hardware parts I see:

For 3D (colour) printing, the right hardware is important, but for any 3D printing task, it is my experience that the software toolchain is at least equally important. And as 3D colour printing is still at bleeding edge development, I wish for guides of working and tested toolchains, and I see headings Diamond_Hotend#Slicer_settings and Diamond_Hotend#Multi-material_printing_with_Repetier_Host addressing this wish, with references and links to several open source toolchain components, as well as configuration details to make each of these software tools work with the Diamond Hotend.

So until actual shipment of the first actual product, it seems to me to be quite premature to flag this page as "advertising only".

So far this page seems to me to be a "development description page", and so far it seems to me to contain a rather complete presentation of all components, settings and sources of the (functioning) prototype.

--MrAlvin (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2015 (PDT)



I see here: Diamond_Hotend#Revision_History that 10 beta testing pieces have been made, and I find that https://www.facebook.com/groups/diamondhotend is where the small beta testing "community" is hanging out.

--MrAlvin (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2015 (PDT)


we generally don't care very much about what they are doing outside the wiki with regards to whatever funding method they are using to fund a production run thats not really our problem, the wiki page currently doesn't even specify a licence type and doesn't actually say if it's even going to be an opensource project or not, we've seen a number of these types of projects come and go and a lot of time we don't end up with usable sources if any at all (the Alligator board is the current classic example) first and foremost this wiki is intended to support opensource 3d printers and other opensource components used in them, we are in no way obligated to host any content this includes pages built to advertise projects undergoing crowd funding campaigns , we are also in the process of cleaning up the wiki and so far we have come across multiple projects aged in years which have claimed to be opensource but have never produced a single source file despite being sold for a fair amount of time,

on the 30th or April we will look at this page again and make a decision as to the fate of this page , hopefully by then we will have had some communication with the author and come to some sort of agreement on the topic of sources.--Thejollygrimreaper (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2015 (PDT)


  • And who are the "we" that you refer to, and how may one get in touch with those "we"?
  • Also, is there a guide of how "you" want developers to format wiki pages and minimum content descriptions, so these wiki pages may be open for anyone starting out with a development?
  • It is my expectation that ALL information on reprap.org is licensed under GPL. This is what used to be said on the front page when we (Rapatan and I) first used reprap.org to publish the MetalicaRap pages, as our own wiki (labitat.dk) at that time was covered in its entirety by the "GNU Free Documentation License 1.2" and MetalicaRap HAD TO BE a GPL license.
    • Hmmm.. I now see that it is changed to: per page option and the specific license it is part of the {{Development}} template.

--MrAlvin (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2015 (PDT)