User:Jrk337

From RepRap
Revision as of 17:55, 3 November 2012 by Jrk337 (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome


My name is Joe Kotvas and this is my user page for the RepRap wiki.

Blogs


Blog 9

In the first article The future of higher education: reshaping universities through 3D printing it discusses how libraries use to be used to share public knowledge. It would be about public conversation to share knowledge. Compared to now a days where they are a quiet place where no food or drinks are allowed. In a way I disagree with the author saying how the libraries should not have turned into quiet places. Sometimes when you're studying you like a nice quiet atmosphere, but there should be a part in the library where you can be loud to share ideas. I also like the idea where DeLaMare's library has a section of walls in whiteboard paint. When working on homework having a whiteboard to discuss ideas with a group. So the reprap would be great in an area where you can be loud and discuss ideas.

The only libraries I am familiar with is the Hammond Engineering Library, The Osmond Library, and the Patee/Paterno Library. I'm not a big fan of going to libraries much because they are so over crowded most of the time. I only go there to use a book that I do not own. If they were to put one in a library my guess would it go in the engineering library since those students would use it the most. Or you could have a designated room for it to go in.

Blog 8

1. If you make the 3D printer yourself there is no way they could control what you print. This regards to the part of the article where the printer will require a password to print a file part so that the part will not be patent infringed. But as everything goes who says you can't draw the part up yourself in a CAD program and print it off yourself? No matter what types of rules and regulations they try to put on open source printing, which is defeating the purpose of open source, people will find a way around them as people do for everything. So in a way this article doesn't support what I said before. The technology may find use in production model 3D printers but not in homemade repraps.

Blog 7

1. I really can't think of any implications these could bring right now. If I think of any I will re edit this and add them.

2. With our printers one big problem I could see is preciseness. Our printers our not as precise as the ones they use and I could see the designs getting deformed from our printers.

3. The contact switches with the built in LED's would be great for light switches. This way when you walk into a dark room the switch would be lit up so it wouldn't be hard to find the light switch. I do not know about any projects but in a few labs I have used accelerometers. These would be great in the lab.

Blog 6

1. I'm really not sure what I think of Bio printing. I mean if it worked 100% correctly it seems like it would be great. Especially how you could deposit cells directly into a wound for the military to make it heal faster. The only type of legal problems I could forsee is copyright or patent infringement with copying certain parts.

2. I think it would definitely extend DIY research. Smaller universities with small funding would use the rep raps to do research. It would help them significantly because they may not be able to afford large expensive machines for research so rep raps would be perfect for them.

Blog 5

1. I would probably attempt to obtain a license if I was a dedicated member. This way you wouldn't be in the "gray area" with the laws. I'd want the process to be as legal as it could be.

2. I think it should be regulated. It would be nearly impossible to regulate it though. How would you be able to control what people printed off at their homes if they already had the file. I could see it being regulated on thingiverse such as not allowing weapon files to be posted but that is about it. It's more of a safety issue than anything because would you want a criminal having access to weapon files, but then again if they want to achieve this I'm sure they would find a way.

3. Anything involving drug paraphernalia would definitely attract the same attention but that's about the only other thing I can think of.

Blog 4

It seems that the new makerbot 3D printer will be closed source. This will not allow any to replicate their design. Do you think makerbot was getting sick of everyone copying their designs for free instead of having to pay a hefty price for all the dimensions and such? I don't blame them considering the fact of how much more money they could be making if they charged everyone a fee for the dimensions and design. Except with them doing this it kinda defeats the whole purpose of open source printing. Prusa is concerned because he does not want makerbot to own all of his designs that he uploaded to thingiverse. He wants people to be allowed to use his design so he uploaded them to his own website. It seems as we might have to begin to look for a new thingiverse, but like the post says hopefully this is just some mumbo jumbo added by lawyers.

Blog 3

1. No I do not think this will be applied to 3D printing. How can they place a control on distribution when you are building and making parts from your own machine. 3D printing definitely isn't going to disappear. It has just begun and will only get larger.

2. I do not have a great idea but I do have a passion. My passion is Jeeps. I love working on Jeeps. Anything from putting on lift kits, doing custom modifications, and to even changing oil. My friends always joke and say once you get me on this topic I don't stop and that's the truth. It's really not a way to attract future mates because few girls are into the offroad/Jeep scene but you do meet a lot of people who share the same interest as you.

3. I do not agree with him. I think intellectual property will never die. People will always be constantly making patents and copyrights and other people will always be making illegal copies of it. So in a way it will put a damper on intellectual property but it will never die.


Blog 2:

1. I do not think the goal is feasible. My reason being is that how many people are actually going to want to take the time to build one of these machines or how many people are going to want to set up this machine to print a part when they can go buy one. Some people, such as older folks, have a hard enough times using cell phones, imagine them trying to download a file from the internet to print a part they need.

2. I think the phrase means you can build anything you want and you don't have to be rich. Once you have this machine your limitations of building objects is almost endless. This is where the wealth comes in. Calling the objects all your "wealth" where you don't have to have "money" to operate it. The only item to have to keep purchasing is the plastic used to build the parts. Only problem you may have is when a part breaks on the machine and you do not have another machine available to make the part.

3. In the future I can see the RepRap machine being able to make designs quicker and put out items a lot faster than it can now. There may be also larger versions of the machine for larger scale objects.


Blog 1:

1. Useful

Fry-Pod for Cup Holder with Locking Catsup Tray

How many times are you driving down the road trying to dig through the fast food bag to grab your french fries you just ordered at the drive through? This will make eating your french fries in the car a lot easier.

2. Artistic/Beautiful

Flame Light Shade

I think it takes some serious artistic skill to make something like this. The design of it is just very unique.

3. Pointless/Useless

I-phone Stand

I would never buy a stand for my phone. What would be the point of it?

4. Funny

Chinese Throwing Spork

How can you look at this and not laugh? Chinese Throwing Spork.

5. Weird

Autumn Egg Cup

If you have eggs sitting on stands I think that would make you very weird.