Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

ultimaker, makerbot, and reprap

Posted by shysf 
ultimaker, makerbot, and reprap
April 23, 2011 04:20PM
what seems to be the difference between these home built 3d printers? ultimaker, makerbot and reprap? I just found the ultimaker. wonder if more will start appearing before I make up my mind of which one I want.
Re: ultimaker, makerbot, and reprap
April 23, 2011 07:03PM
Ok,
A family tree would be good here, but basically

RepRap Darwin is the Grandfather.

RepRap Mendel is the Dad.
RepRap Mendel Prusa is the Younger Brother
MakerBot Is the Second Cousin.

UltiMaker is sort of an amalgam of the Darwin shape, the RepRap Mendel Firmware(s) (I'm guessing), and the Makerbot Form Factor (Laser-cut Wood).

As near as I can tell, it's still vapor, or at least it's been on pre-order for as long as I've been aware of it. It's not self-replicating (the makerbot too AFAIK).

Aside from this, they all are similar if not identical in operation.
Re: ultimaker, makerbot, and reprap
April 24, 2011 01:53PM
I will make it even simpler

RepRap $500 200x200 build area (Prusa Mendel)
RepRap Kit $825 Makergear.com 200x200 build area
Makerbot Thingomatic $1300 120x120 build area
Ultimachine $1700 200x200 build area

All of these options print about the same, some a bit better than others, but it's not a matter of "you get what you pay for", it's more a matter of "you get what your WORK for". RepRap put together by a careful, inquisitive person can print WAY better than a person that throws together an Ultimaker and expects it to do wonders with no work.

The "officialish" way to get a RepRap is to self source the $500 dollar way.


repraplogphase.blogspot.com
Re: ultimaker, makerbot, and reprap
April 24, 2011 05:04PM
Ultimachine is different than Ultimaker.

Ultimaker's axes layout allow it to be very fast. I think it effectively holds the print speed record so far. To my knowledge it's not available yet for retail.
Re: ultimaker, makerbot, and reprap
April 24, 2011 08:00PM
Ultimaker appears to be a MUCH more well thought out machine. It is slightly more expensive to produce than other competing models, but it promises to have better rigidity, speed, and footprint/build area ratio; mostly because it is the new kid on the block and has learned from other's mistakes. Did I mention they have great assembly documentation so far?

It's still somewhat unknown how well it works in the long run though, as very few have been made and tested by the public. It is certainly a more expensive option as well, and lacks heated bed support from what I have seen (which is a deal breaker for me)

Just an opinion.
Hi, does anyone have any experience extruding 1,75mm? How does it compare to 3mm? Is it faster? Can you get better resolution parts with 1,75mm?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login