Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: PIC ring buffer (and SNAP traffic visibility)

Posted by sai 
sai
Re: PIC ring buffer (and SNAP traffic visibility)
August 06, 2007 03:35AM
Forrest wrote:
> This is probably a stupid question, but wouldn't it be more efficient to use a star network instead of a ring? That way the message would go directly to the pic in question and back instead of doing the rounds of all the other pics on the ring. It would seem, anyway.
>

The most efficient way to do it would probably be a bus, which might be
what you're suggesting. For a long time now there has been a plan to
migrate to an i2c bus. We ended up using serial as an interim
get-up-and-running-quickly approach. Not only will i2c be faster that
the async serial in terms of bits per second, there is no propagation
delays that depend on the number of nodes in the network.

_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
Developers@reprap.org
[reprap.org]
Re: PIC ring buffer (and SNAP traffic visibility)
August 06, 2007 09:27AM
I2C would be nice. I've been looking for an excuse to use the technique.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login