Thanks a lot for your reply bobc. If I understand well you message, can I say that : * GPL and CC-BY-SA are not adapted to the models of 3D printers, and don't protect the authors/creators/makers if they want to follow the spirit of the GPL because everyone can easily take their ideas without getting back to the community ? * so we also maybe can think that a a 3D printer under CC-BY-SA-NC isby gfabre - General
Thanks DeuxVis for having moved the message.[ QuoteDeuxVis As for my opinion on the subject : people are being ignorant or careless here. I don't think there's much bad will in these licensing behaviour, but perhaps I'm just optimistic. I think too, the licences are very complicated, and the confusion with open source licence and CC commons with NC are very commons.by gfabre - General
Hello, This message is not a troll or a denigration of people that not are not doing open source or open hardware things, it's only to understand . I'm newbie and would like to bought an open source 3D printer, and I discovered these two : * Microdelta under CC-BY-NC-SA licence * P3Steel under CC-BY-NC-SA licence Finally I didn't bought one of them because their licences weren't open souby gfabre - General