Talk:LRC
Vote for deletion
Please drop this whole idea, it's completely misguided and won't even work. LRC is not only a waste of time, it is detrimental to Open Source.
If you care about Open Source, do not use LRC, it will cut you off from Open Source development.
If you want to make some money for development, do not use LRC. It provides no legal or practical use. There is no queue of companies waiting to pay you for your idea.
--Bobc (talk) 02:15, 22 October 2013 (PDT)
- I do not understand your personal dislike for this concept.
- Developing and getting nothing in return is also a waste of time. Oddly enough it does not directly relate to Open Source.
- LRC is about freedom and fairness, it does not need legal standing. The practical use is the provision of an alternative licence model to test. There is no queue of companies waiting to pay for GPL ideas either so what is the harm in that?
- If it fails what have you personally lost? Certainly you have gained my disclosures under a licence you do not honour.
