User talk:Danielpublic/RepRap/Mainpage suggestions
Hmm. Why do you put the original Huxley to the "legacy" ones while keeping the RepRapPro Huxley? In general I'm not exactly enthusiastic about one single vendor showing his designs on the front page. The front page should put emphasis on neutrality. --Traumflug 11:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
BTW., is this discussed somewhere? --Traumflug 11:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Well, I just copied the frontpage source and made those: "[[Wikipedia:GNU_GPL|Freely]] available, with no or little restrictions for the benefit of everyone." changes. So it's not a big overhaul, yet anyways.
I as well wholeheartedly agree with the neutrality of the page in question, I guess however it is a matter of "true & proven" for models also. I might also want to point out that as a noob that hasn't really looked how a Prusa differs from a RepRapPro Mendel. After all there are a few out there. Quick thought/note to self, I'll toss together a suggestionpage with a gallery divided by base frame geometry.
- That's right, there are many Mendel variants. So IMHO, there is no justification to raise the RepRapPro Mendel over other variants by giving it its own place next to the "general" Mendel. --Traumflug 10:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
BTW, I would love to see a page where those matters were discussed. Danielpublic 12:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- For discussions we have a forum. --Traumflug 10:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)