Vendors I (we) Like. November 07, 2016 08:56PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 36 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 04:08AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,525 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 05:48AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 528 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 10:10AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 471 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 10:48AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 98 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 11:00AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 3,525 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 11:06AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 312 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 12:01PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 517 |
Quote
KDog
The whole reason for open source is so that the design can be used and hopefully improved upon by others.
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 02:20PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 98 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 02:50PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 517 |
Quote
KDog
I disagree. The Chinese E3D clones are obviously inferior quality and I've never heard anyone say otherwise. Folks are having nothing but problems with them. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out they are not the same as the original. At the same time people are figuring out how to make them work because they don't have the $70 to get the original. Nothing wrong with that. They were never going to be customers of E3D anyway.
There are plenty of threads on this site showing how to convert Chinese stuff to working stuff. The market figures all this stuff out. Good open source companies are constantly improving their stuff to stay competitive. Outside of China there are plenty of examples of folks coming up with "improved" versions that compete directly with the originals. Nothing wrong with that either. E3D is not in any trouble.
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 08, 2016 03:02PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 517 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 10, 2016 01:12AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 288 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 13, 2016 09:34AM |
Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 537 |
Quote
ElmoC
Quote
KDog
I disagree. The Chinese E3D clones are obviously inferior quality and I've never heard anyone say otherwise. Folks are having nothing but problems with them. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out they are not the same as the original. At the same time people are figuring out how to make them work because they don't have the $70 to get the original. Nothing wrong with that. They were never going to be customers of E3D anyway.
There are plenty of threads on this site showing how to convert Chinese stuff to working stuff. The market figures all this stuff out. Good open source companies are constantly improving their stuff to stay competitive. Outside of China there are plenty of examples of folks coming up with "improved" versions that compete directly with the originals. Nothing wrong with that either. E3D is not in any trouble.
The problem as I see it are with the newer people who don't realize there is a difference to start with. I have seen comments in the past saying the E3D hot end are crap only to find out they had a bad clone, but they are now soured on E3D. There is a group of people who never would be a customer of E3D, but there is also a group that had they not had the bad experience to begin with, or known the difference, would have been. Making a poor clone and calling it by the name bad for all environments, not just 3D printing. Other businesses have more ability to flex legal muscle against cloners than the 3D community.
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 13, 2016 10:28AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 98 |
Re: Vendors I (we) Like. November 13, 2016 11:54AM |
Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 537 |
Quote
KDog
What happened to J-Head is what can happen to any company. The product stayed the same for too long. Not only were there plenty of J-Head type hotends available, (it is open source btw) many American made, but you had companies like E3D starting up which were busy revolutionizing the all-metal hotend. In J-Head's heydey you only had PLA and ABS print options. Newer hotends were trying to push temperature limits and succeeded. Go back and look at E3D posts from the time and you will see lots of folks saying that an all-metal hotend would never work. Show me a new printer being sold today that is using a J-head nozzle. Open source has its pitfalls but lack of innovation will kill any company and if the clones become as good as or better than the original then the company is sunk. I'm not advocating the use of E3D clones, they have big problems as I've already stated, but folks trying to build a RepRap for under $200 are not going to have an original E3D on that printer. The best we can do is to keep telling folks what the difference is between the clones and the original.