Cain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. The thick and thin sheets: how much does the
> thickness matter? I operate my schools cnc plasma
> cutter, and I have some scrap 3/8" aluminum that
> is the perfect size for the "frog", and none of
> the metal we have is measured in metric (Imperial
> system

). Can the additional thickness be
> calibrated out easily?
The bed doesn't matter too much, as you can adjust the springs and the Z opto height to get it correct. You still don't want it too thick, especially if you want to heat it. Thicker = more thermal mass = harder to heat and/or keep the temp consistent.
If anything, the frog is the one to watch. If it's too thick, the belt may rub on the underside of the frog. This isn't a real show-stopper, but it may be better to err on the slightly thinner side vs the slightly thicker side.
That said, 3/8" = 9.525mm, which is way too big. You want 3/16" or 5/32" really (4-5mm thick).
Definitely don't want more than 5mm for the aluminium bed, from a heating perspective.
> Might just be that I don't understand how you
> initially set up the opto-endstops, specifically
> for the Z axis. How does the machine know how/how
> do you adjust how far down the nozzle will go
> before it crashes into the bed? is this easy to
> adjust?
The Opto boards sit on a plastic spring, so you can adjust their height. You can also bend the opto flag if required.
> 3. Extruders. I was initially planning on using
> Wade's extruder, but now I'm questioning this
> choice. Is there any other "better" extrusion
> system developed so far, and would a direct-drive
> system be more desirable in any way? the motors I
> have for my Mendel are about 5 times the minimum
> holding torque requirement, so I'm thinking that
> wouldn't be a problem.
I'd go with either a Wades or Adrians geared extruder. The difference is in how the nozzle mounts. Wades by default can't take the new extruder hot end design (no bolt holes for the PEEK block).
> 4. How many people, if any, have multiple
> extrusion heads that can be used for the same
> print? i.e. multiple materials/support material.
> Are there any repraps using support material? I
> thought I read the other day about somebody using
> some sort of water-soluble PLA material.
Not many, but expect that to change. A number of compact extruders are appearing that allow multiple heads in a small space. The people who have been playing with multiple extruders, (using different materials) are the "IFeel beta" guys. [
www.ifeelbeta.de]
> 5. Is there any reason why the reprap cannot be
> easily scaled up in size? Would this even require
> firmware modification, would moving the
> opto-endstops be enough?
Depends on your definition of scaled up.
If you mean larger print areas, this has been done. The problem is speed, and that is dependent on how thick your filament is, which affects the resolution of corners on parts.
If you mean multiple sizes of filament so that you can fill print large objects with thick filament at a high rate, while small features get printed with thin filament, I've not seen it done. It's something I'd love to see.
> 6. I understand that 3 opto-endstops are the
> minimum to function effectively, but what are the
> advantages of using 6 (3 for home, 3 for limit)?
> what systems are in place to prevent the machine
> from trying to move outside it's build area and
> destroying parts of itself, if any?
Depends on what hits what as to whether it'll destroy anything.
A note: The default way a Wades sits on the X carriage allows it to hit the angled bars of the triangle vertices on each side of the build area. Adrians doesn't suffer from this. That said, it's possible to print a bracket to reorientate the Wades at 90 degrees so this isn't an issue.
PS: I'm sure others will answer the rest of your questions, or add in info on my answers.