Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 24, 2019 11:51AM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 126 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 24, 2019 01:52PM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 265 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 24, 2019 05:13PM |
Admin Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 3,096 |
Quote
MMcLure
That was one reason I decided to go with a Re-ARM/RAMPS solution instead of the SKR 1.3 when I upgraded my machine to 32 bit. In my case it was the lack of a PS_ON pin plus available pins to run RGBW LEDs. I like the fact that the SKR 1.3 handles TMC drivers without extra wiring, but unfortunately the lack of GPIO pins is a problem in my use case.
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 25, 2019 04:21AM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 126 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 25, 2019 04:49AM |
Admin Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 3,096 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 25, 2019 08:46AM |
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 126 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 26, 2019 02:21PM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 265 |
Quote
Ohmarinus
Quote
MMcLure
That was one reason I decided to go with a Re-ARM/RAMPS solution instead of the SKR 1.3 when I upgraded my machine to 32 bit. In my case it was the lack of a PS_ON pin plus available pins to run RGBW LEDs. I like the fact that the SKR 1.3 handles TMC drivers without extra wiring, but unfortunately the lack of GPIO pins is a problem in my use case.
But wait, I think you should be able to manage the PS_ON pin in pins with Marlin, no? Or does it need to be a physical PS_ON pin that is impossible to set to a specific pinout?
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 26, 2019 05:52PM |
Admin Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 3,096 |
Quote
MMcLure
Quote
Ohmarinus
Quote
MMcLure
That was one reason I decided to go with a Re-ARM/RAMPS solution instead of the SKR 1.3 when I upgraded my machine to 32 bit. In my case it was the lack of a PS_ON pin plus available pins to run RGBW LEDs. I like the fact that the SKR 1.3 handles TMC drivers without extra wiring, but unfortunately the lack of GPIO pins is a problem in my use case.
But wait, I think you should be able to manage the PS_ON pin in pins with Marlin, no? Or does it need to be a physical PS_ON pin that is impossible to set to a specific pinout?
Setting the PS_ON pin to a generic GPIO pin is not a big deal - just a tweak to the pins.h file for the board. However pretty much all of the pins that are available as GPIO on for example a RAMPS are directed to the stepper driver jumpers on the SKR. Which makes them really easy to use for driving TMC steppers but makes them a real pain to use as GPIO if you're using "dumb" steppers. I just wish they'd added a GPIO pin header for those of us still using dumb steppers. All of the easily available GPIO pins on the EXP1/EXP2 connectors are taken up by an LCD.
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 27, 2019 03:21PM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 265 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? June 27, 2019 04:14PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 5,743 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? October 22, 2019 02:00PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 13 |
Re: Do I have to sacrifice the filament runout sensor for 32 bit? December 25, 2019 09:26PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 1 |