New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 02, 2015 03:14PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 02, 2015 05:44PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 395 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 02, 2015 08:07PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,699 |
Quote
dc42
- Improved the step ISR and step pulse generation efficiency to allow higher movement speeds, especially when using 0.9deg/step motors
- Support for drive remapping
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 02:03AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 06:48AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,699 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 07:18AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 859 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 08:37AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 09:23AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 395 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 10:18AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,159 |
Quote
Fpex
Btw anybody duet? Now it is even more tempting using a duet for my Kossel as it supports easily a kraken with more stable temps and less fiddling around as for the smoothie. But then, what am I going to do with the smoothie???
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 11:51AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 859 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 12:35PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 1,230 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 12:54PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 859 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 03:56PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 859 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 03, 2015 04:04PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Quote
KimBrown
Must say thou that the stepper motors sound much nicer since the Firmware upgrade.....
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 04, 2015 07:22AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 395 |
Quote
dougal1957
Quote
Fpex
Btw anybody duet? Now it is even more tempting using a duet for my Kossel as it supports easily a kraken with more stable temps and less fiddling around as for the smoothie. But then, what am I going to do with the smoothie???
Build a CNC Router/engraver/laser type machine and use it on there that's what I bought my Smoothie for.
Doug
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 04, 2015 07:47AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Quote
Fpex
David, is your firmware easy to adapt to Kossels that are not the mini?
Quote
Fpex
Also the new diet has a decicated header for the panel due, does this mean I need a different then the standard one !
Thanks.
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 04, 2015 07:59AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 395 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 12, 2015 01:52PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 22 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 12, 2015 02:41PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Quote
Alex74
- I have a bed.g in my sys-Folder. Am I right that I dont need it anymore ? I have deleted it and the G32 looks okay.
Quote
Alex74
- I use the original Ormerod2 IR sensor. The M558 P2 is correct in config.g ?
Quote
Alex74
- On G32 the Printer is extremly fast. Okay. But if I print more then once part, then ride between the parts is extremly fast, too. So fast that I often think the part will be taken with if it doesn't stick enough on the bed. Can I slow it down ? I haven't changed the Travelspeed in my slicer. It's like before (250mm/s).
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 13, 2015 10:35AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,699 |
Quote
dc42
btw version 1.09i should be capable of 40000mm/min XY moves on an Ormerod, given sufficient acceleration and if necessary a higher motor drive voltage.
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 13, 2015 03:27PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Quote
Treito
Quote
dc42
btw version 1.09i should be capable of 40000mm/min XY moves on an Ormerod, given sufficient acceleration and if necessary a higher motor drive voltage.
I tested this with version 1.09j on an Ormerod MK1. It works indeed and I am astonished but I am aalso little bit afraid. As I am using a bed.g-file there was no advantage, but how safe is this? If the way is blocked and the carriage drive into something for example I am afraid that this does not end in a good way.
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 14, 2015 01:29AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,699 |
;*** If you have a modulated IR probe with on-board microcontroller, change P2 to P1 in the following M558 P1 ; Use a simple modulated Z probe (change to P1 for an intelligent Z probe)
;*** If you have a modulated IR probe with on-board microcontroller, change P1 to P2 in the following M558 P1 ; Use a simple modulated Z probe (change to P2 for an intelligent Z probe)As P1 did not work for me with a 4-pin IR-Probe.
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 14, 2015 02:10AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 14, 2015 02:19AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,699 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 20, 2015 03:00PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 22 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 20, 2015 03:20PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 20, 2015 03:25PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Quote
Treito
But P1 is the normal version and shows the normal behaviour (as I use this with my Ormerod MK1) and with P2 I get two values so there is a typo at the description. So we both are wrong. Or I am getting a big explanation why I am in trouble with my MK1-sensor.
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 20, 2015 03:36PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 22 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 20, 2015 03:51PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,699 |
Re: New firmware 1.09i-dc42 September 20, 2015 06:04PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,672 |
Quote
Alex74
My homing files are like before.
If I do a homing via Web Interface the speed is normal.
Only on starting printing it is very slow.
My maximum speed travel is like in your config.g - and this is very fast !
Okay, youre right, I do a manually homing and bed compensation before printing.
So a Homing in gcode wouldn't be necessary.
I'll have a look at 1.09k...