Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 November 29, 2016 05:32PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,049 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 November 29, 2016 05:58PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 363 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 01, 2016 12:07AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 105 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 04, 2016 01:42PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 45 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 04, 2016 04:32PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,684 |
Quote
advancedrescue
Hey guys, been working on stripping the cubepro and getting the cubex ready to mount into the shell of the pro. The feet and braces are different but no problem swapping.
I do have the heater that came with the pro. I'm sure it will but figured I'd ask, will I be able to configure to work with the smoothie board and the duet?
As you can tell I'm not as familiar with swapping the boards as you all. I'll be soone taking on the adventure. It's the only reason I even bought these.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 04, 2016 09:03PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 45 |
Quote
dc42
Quote
advancedrescue
Hey guys, been working on stripping the cubepro and getting the cubex ready to mount into the shell of the pro. The feet and braces are different but no problem swapping.
I do have the heater that came with the pro. I'm sure it will but figured I'd ask, will I be able to configure to work with the smoothie board and the duet?
As you can tell I'm not as familiar with swapping the boards as you all. I'll be soone taking on the adventure. It's the only reason I even bought these.
When you say 'heater', do you mean the hot end heater or the bed heater?
The hot end heater should work ok with any electronics, if you power it with the voltage it was intended for.
The bed heater will be OK as long as the current draw does not exceed the rating of the electronics bed heater output. If you don't know the current draw, measure the heater resistance and divide it into the supply voltage. The Duet WiFi is rated at 15A bed current but we may increase that when the new thermal test results come in. You can control a higher current than the electronics can handle by itself using an appropriate solid state relay.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 05, 2016 02:50AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,684 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 05, 2016 11:59AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 45 |
Quote
dc42
So it's a chamber heater. It's likely to draw a lot of current, so you may need to use a solid state relay to drive it. I presume it has an associated thermistor, which you can connect to a spare thermistor input on the electronics.
RepRapFirmware on Duet supports some gcodes to control chamber heaters, see [reprap.org] and [reprap.org]. You can use one of these in your slicer start gcode to set the chamber temperature at the start of a print.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 06, 2016 02:29PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 1,401 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 06, 2016 02:45PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 55 |
Quote
ggherbaz
Have anyone tried to do the same with a cube 3d 3rd. Generation? They are cheap on eBay and thinking on dive with one.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 06, 2016 03:41PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 45 |
Quote
Dancook
Quote
ggherbaz
Have anyone tried to do the same with a cube 3d 3rd. Generation? They are cheap on eBay and thinking on dive with one.
Looks like it would be a fun little project... not sure how the print quality would be, and if they've made it as reliant on proprietary filament as our Cubex's... nothing a new controller won't cure :-)
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 06, 2016 04:07PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 55 |
Quote
advancedrescue
I got one. Haven't modified it really tho. It's just as reliant on the proprietary filament as all their printers. It uses the optical sensor for z height.print quality is nice tho. Plan on keeping mine as is for now due to having a bunch of cartridges I got on the cheap, and also concentrating on building the cubex.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 06, 2016 06:48PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 1,401 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 06, 2016 10:07PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 363 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 07, 2016 10:02AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 47 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 07, 2016 10:31AM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 321 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 07, 2016 10:54AM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 55 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 07, 2016 11:39AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 47 |
Quote
DaGameFace
thats because the home position is 0,0 and is off the bed. 0,0 should be at the corner of the bed configure your endstop settings so it knows that its at negative coordinates at its home position
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 07, 2016 11:41AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 47 |
Quote
Dancook
Aye... I replaced all of my end stop switches. It took me a while to figure out the homing and 0,0,0 coordinates... and like DGF said, I had to figure out the negative X,Y coordinates of the front left corner so that 0,0 was at the corner of my build plate. Certainly a hard hobby to figure out all of the little technical things like that on your own!
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 07, 2016 07:40PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 105 |
Quote
fg dude
Quote
DaGameFace
thats because the home position is 0,0 and is off the bed. 0,0 should be at the corner of the bed configure your endstop settings so it knows that its at negative coordinates at its home position
True, as I have no problems with electricity and mechanics, the more I have on programming, no clue where I can change this, In cura or in the Marlin Fw so any help on where and how would be welcome
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 03:43AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 14,684 |
Quote
Firefox3D
Had fun earlier, changed the hot-end fan onto the PWM Duet fan connection as I discovered even with the sealed chamber at nearly 60 degrees it only needs to run about 50% which keeps the draught on the ABS as low as possible. Went to change filament and forgot to switch on the fan, and guess what it jammed during retraction. Found it had thoroughly jammed itself in the inner tube after total disassembly, won't do that again!
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 08:43AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 47 |
Quote
Firefox3D
Quote
fg dude
Quote
DaGameFace
thats because the home position is 0,0 and is off the bed. 0,0 should be at the corner of the bed configure your endstop settings so it knows that its at negative coordinates at its home position
True, as I have no problems with electricity and mechanics, the more I have on programming, no clue where I can change this, In cura or in the Marlin Fw so any help on where and how would be welcome
Can't see an option for creating a bed offset in Cura or Slic3r, there is in Simplify3d as I used it before I converted the printer.
However if you want to set the 0,0 to the corner of the build plate, manually move or measure the X,Y values then add this to your Cura start.g file - under Start/End-GCode tab
G1 Z3 ; so nozzle clears the bed - could be more if you want
G1 X (value) Y (value) ; move to measured corner of build plate - eg X25 Y30
G92 X0 Y0 ; zero X and Y
Got used to stuff like this as I haven't implemented a z-limit yet, so get into the habit of moving the Z to 120 when I finish and turn off, then set Z to 120 when I startup again.
Jon
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 10:23AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 105 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 11:44AM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 55 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 12:45PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 321 |
Quote
Dancook
My set up probably isn't the best practice, but since it's been working perfectly, I haven't touched it.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 01:38PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 105 |
Quote
dc42
Quote
Firefox3D
Had fun earlier, changed the hot-end fan onto the PWM Duet fan connection as I discovered even with the sealed chamber at nearly 60 degrees it only needs to run about 50% which keeps the draught on the ABS as low as possible. Went to change filament and forgot to switch on the fan, and guess what it jammed during retraction. Found it had thoroughly jammed itself in the inner tube after total disassembly, won't do that again!
Why not configure it as a thermostatic fan? See [reprap.org].
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 08, 2016 03:08PM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 47 |
Quote
fg dude
Quote
Firefox3D
Quote
fg dude
Quote
DaGameFace
thats because the home position is 0,0 and is off the bed. 0,0 should be at the corner of the bed configure your endstop settings so it knows that its at negative coordinates at its home position
True, as I have no problems with electricity and mechanics, the more I have on programming, no clue where I can change this, In cura or in the Marlin Fw so any help on where and how would be welcome
Can't see an option for creating a bed offset in Cura or Slic3r, there is in Simplify3d as I used it before I converted the printer.
However if you want to set the 0,0 to the corner of the build plate, manually move or measure the X,Y values then add this to your Cura start.g file - under Start/End-GCode tab
G1 Z3 ; so nozzle clears the bed - could be more if you want
G1 X (value) Y (value) ; move to measured corner of build plate - eg X25 Y30
G92 X0 Y0 ; zero X and Y
Got used to stuff like this as I haven't implemented a z-limit yet, so get into the habit of moving the Z to 120 when I finish and turn off, then set Z to 120 when I startup again.
Jon
Thanks for the help Jon, I'll give it a try
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 09, 2016 01:09AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 45 |
Quote
Dancook
Quote
advancedrescue
I got one. Haven't modified it really tho. It's just as reliant on the proprietary filament as all their printers. It uses the optical sensor for z height.print quality is nice tho. Plan on keeping mine as is for now due to having a bunch of cartridges I got on the cheap, and also concentrating on building the cubex.
I'd love to have one here at the office to tinker with.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 09, 2016 01:26AM |
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 45 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 December 11, 2016 07:53AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 5,789 |