Show all posts by user
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 — 29 of 29
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Quotedc42
Are you sure? tfree0.g should be called whenever T0 is switched from active to standby. Are you running my firmware fork, or chrishamm's?
Your firmware!
From Tx active to Tx standby everything is ok, tfreex.g is called.
But I wonder, if tfreex.g should also be called from Tx active to Ty active?
Because Tx is then also released?
Quotedc42
Currently you
by
Sergio
-
Firmware - mainstream and related support
Hi all,
I was experimenting with the command mentioned in the subject and have some question about them, could not find anything in the forum.
If I select a tool from standby like T0 then tpre0.g and tpost0.g is called.
I I unselect with T99, then tfree0.g is called, but if I select another tool, letzt say T1, then tfree0.g is not called, why is this?
When tpost0.g containing a M98 Pmacro_file
by
Sergio
-
Firmware - mainstream and related support
Thank you David,
will use B 4388 now.
It look weird to me, because B 4338 is listed on the data sheet as for the GT204-2, I was thinking it is the same value (and you maybe pick the wrong line) but it is not, I should be more careful!
by
Sergio
-
Duet
David,
on the linked "Connecting thermistors" page, is the B value correct for the Semitec GT104-2?
GT104-2 has a B value of 4267 regarding to the data sheet?
by
Sergio
-
Duet
MatterControl opens up a few unexpected files.
Don't know, and I have not checked it further, but my first impression was "spyware"?
Why is this? Should I be concerned?
Does anybody know something?
Here are some of the files in question that are opened by MatterControl:
/System/Library/Frameworks/AddressBook.framework/Versions/A/AddressBook
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ContactsPersistence.
by
Sergio
-
General
Mikk36,
of course! ;-), I'm currently using the Mac prusa build by the way.
But regarding the other question?
Is there a way to use individual volumetric speeds per extruder?
by
Sergio
-
Slic3r
Hi dmould,
do you think it is worth to open a new topic in "General"?
by
Sergio
-
Ormerod
Thank you JamesK,
You are right, it was not easy to do it, I basically used 2mm and smaller bits and took a sample of the molten PLA (using ice water).
Thats why I'm not trying to measure it immediately again.
To be clear, I think E3D is a great provider of innovation and hardware for the community and I don't want to make them too bad.
They are surly capable of manufacturing very good hardware
by
Sergio
-
General
JamesK,
Thank you, very interesting.
I remember having measured 1.15mm +- 0.2 for C in my V6-NOZZLE-175-400, it should be 0.6 as indicated in the drawing, either my measuring was wrong or there are at least three versions of the V6-NOZZLE-175-400 circulating around.
Will measure it again and report later on this.
This is all very time consuming... ;-)
by
Sergio
-
General
I was also trying to check out MatterControl, but I found, that MatterControl opens up a few files that in my opinion should not be touched by this kind of software
Don't know, and I have not checked it further, but my first impression was "spyware"?
Why is this? Should I be concerned?
Here are some of the files that are open by MatterControl:
/System/Library/Frameworks/AddressBook.framework/Ve
by
Sergio
-
Ormerod
Hi all,
two questions:
Is it posible to choose an individual volumetric speed per extruder?
Does anybody know something about the development roadmap of slic3r, any updates expected in the near future?
Thanks in advance.
by
Sergio
-
Slic3r
To clarify things the_digital_dentist,
I never said that the internal geometry of the V6 nozzles causes the problems, I only pointed out, that E3D is saying the following on their website:
"The new internal geometry of v6 Nozzles is optimised to reduce back-pressure, this ensures smooth,easy flow of filament whilst improving the effectiveness of retractions."
But the geometry shown on the draw
by
Sergio
-
General
ElmoC,
I would not say that Sanjay is "some customer support person".
He confirmed my finding.
There is no need to cut open one.
As I said above, I have an email from him confirming that the geometry is different and on the same time telling me that the V6 has a new design without the D section and that the drawing are old.
Yes, I thought first he is joking but apparently he was not.
by
Sergio
-
General
Quotethe_digital_dentist
Sergio,
in your first post you said you had a "back-pressure problem" and in the last one you said you originally bought these nozzles specifically to reduce "back-pressure".
Three questions:
1) What constitutes a "back-pressure problem"?
2) How would anyone know that they have a "back-pressure" problem and not some other problem?
3) How does the geometric difference
by
Sergio
-
General
To JamesK:
Yes I'm referring to section D.
The Measured length of C in my nozzles seems to be 1.15mm +- 0.2.
Measured with a standard 2mm drill bit.
I bought this nozzles specially to reduce the back pressure.
In my opinion, they should say this clearly on their website, that the V6 design, they are selling now is not optimised to reduce the back pressure, as the former V6 design was as shown o
by
Sergio
-
General
Sorry for my late response,
The nozzles I checked are brass 0.4.
There is no doubt on the removal of the inner smaller bore.
I have also an email from Sanjay confirming it.
Look at the attached image taken from E3D Website with my comments.
All the new V6 brass nozzle I got from E3D look like the steel nozzle on on the right, without the second inner bore.
My questions are, why did they do
by
Sergio
-
General
Hi all,
last year I bought a E3D Kranken with V6 Nozzles and had continuously back pressure issues that I could not really solve.
Analysing the Problem I noticed, that the inner geometry of the nozzle was different from the technical drawings, so I ordered some new ones.
The new ones did look exactly as the old ones.
It is simple to check the inner bore with a magnifying glass.
They are not mad
by
Sergio
-
General
Hi,
here some more infos regarding different bugs I found so far.
Regarding the connection bug, although I said, that there was only one connection, it might not be true.
I did reconnect often, so there might be more unclosed connections in the background.
Also after reconnecting 10+ times during a longer print, I was not anymore able to connect at all, reload did also not work anymore, but the
by
Sergio
-
Firmware - mainstream and related support
Thank you very much, I'm trying to workaround this via software and have some issues I posted here.
I think I will try to use the board as long as possible and get a new one as soon as your newly announced board will be available later this year!
I hope it will be very soon! ;-)
by
Sergio
-
Duet
Firmware Version: 1.09r-dc42 (2016-01-16)
Web Interface Version: HTML: 1.08, JS: 1.08
because of this: post
I did the following remap:
M563 P0 D0 H1 ; tool 0 uses extruder drive 0 and heater 1
M563 P1 D5 H2 ; tool 1 uses extruder drive 5 and heater 2
M563 P2 D2 H3 ; tool 2 uses extruder drive 2 and heater 3
M563 P3 D4 H4 ; tool 3 uses extruder drive 4 and heater 4
omitting D1 and D3,
by
Sergio
-
Firmware - mainstream and related support
Hi,
I accidentally touched a metal rod of my printer with the FAN0 cables of a Duet 0.8.5 + Duex v0.2a, a loud spark jumped over and my FAN0 stopped working, the fan is running at low speed all the time.
I posted this already here: post
Later I noticed that E1 is only going in retraction direction, even if extruding, and when retracting in the retraction direction.
E3 is only shaking back and
by
Sergio
-
Duet
I found that the PMV40UN2R MOSFET is broken, where can I get a single one?
by
Sergio
-
Duet
Hi,
I'm sad, I broke my Duet 0.8.5.
I accidentally touched with the FAN0 connector GND (a metal rod) and a loud spark jumped over.
Now my FAN0 is always on.
Is there any chance to fix that?
Any help is highly appreciate.
--
Sergio
Edit: Typo and more clarification.
by
Sergio
-
Duet
No only one. I think that the problem is a timeout of the auth credentials on the web server or similar.
It does only happen when there is no interaction with the web gui for some time.
I think the parse error was due to communication problem within my network, I was not able to reproduce this other issue until now, I will keep looking.
by
Sergio
-
Firmware - mainstream and related support
Ok, will move this to: Link
by
Sergio
-
Ormerod
Firmware Name: RepRapFirmware
Firmware Version: 1.09r-dc42 (2016-01-16)
Web Interface Version: HTML: 1.08, JS: 1.08
Getting wrong response after following request, this happens rarely and randomly, maybe around 10 mins after connection sometimes quicker.
I encountered this while trying to reproduce the following issue:
IP 192.168.1.2.65205 > 192.168.1.42.http: tcp 393
0x0000: 4500 01b
by
Sergio
-
Firmware - mainstream and related support
The error is reproducible, i will record the traffic and also run M122 after the error, problem is only my limited time...
I will come back to you as quick as possible.
by
Sergio
-
Ormerod
Ok, I got it somehow running, it was not M558, X0 Y0 Z0 means not used for homing.
Trying all possible orders of the probing points I found one (5 points) that worked and does only log one "Triangle interpolation: point outside all triangles!", not flooding the console with hundreds during print leading to connection losses.
The one is printed when the first end switch is triggered, it seems, alt
by
Sergio
-
Ormerod
Dear Forum,
I'm using a DC42 IR Z Probe with Duet 0.8.5 board on a cartesian printer.
Firmware Version: 1.09r-dc42 (2016-01-16) also tried version m
Web Interface Version: HTML: 1.08, JS: 1.08
My problems is that I cannot get auto bed compensation to run correctly.
The relevant parts of the config.g are:
M558 P1 X0 Y0 Z0
G31 X10.0 Y0 Z2.11 P500
I have tried 3, 4 and 5 points, but I encounter
by
Sergio
-
Ormerod