Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 02, 2016 05:06PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 318 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 02, 2016 09:45PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 02, 2016 09:48PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 1,671 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 02, 2016 10:46PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 318 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 02, 2016 10:57PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 12:25AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 03:36AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 08:06AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 09:21AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 10:31AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 12:59PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 1,049 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 03, 2016 06:50PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 04, 2016 12:14AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 04, 2016 05:42PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 05, 2016 10:47AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 05, 2016 07:04PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 05, 2016 07:24PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 05, 2016 11:14PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 06, 2016 05:24PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 06, 2016 06:33PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 06, 2016 06:51PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 06, 2016 08:02PM |
Registered: 8 years ago Posts: 1,671 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 06, 2016 08:39PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Quote
TheJones
Those hotends are coming off as soon as my e3d V6's get here, so I'm not so worried about their nozzle size.
What I'm trying to decide now is if I should turn down the e3d heatsink to fit into that extruder, or if i should make an adapter/mount to attach it underneath.
I'm leaning towards making an adapter so I can use a different extruder if I need to in the future. Cutting the heatsink down is kind of a one way street, there's no going back without buying a new one.
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 06, 2016 11:12PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 07, 2016 09:48PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 08, 2016 09:20PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 08, 2016 11:17PM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 79 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 09, 2016 07:40AM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 09, 2016 07:08PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Re: An alternative to buying a bad kit for $300-500 October 09, 2016 08:24PM |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 5,780 |
Quote
TheJones
There is a PTFE liner that extends down to the melt zone. So no high-temp prints here, which is disappointing because I was hoping to turn this into a high-flow hotend for structural parts and maybe try using polycarbonate. Looks like that's not going to happen with this piece. Also, it may not have been suitable for that anyways, since a lot of what looked like melt-zone turned out to be PTFE lined, making it much shorter than I thought it would be.